Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842811›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2019

Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency colorectal surgery: Review of literature and current practices.

Varut Lohsiriwat, Romyen Jitmungngan

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04194060 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsPeptic Ulcer Perforation, Perforated Bowel, Post-Op Complication, EmergenciesArmsEnhanced Recovery after Surgery group, Conventional
NCT05368233 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Abdominal Drains on the Efficacy of ERAS Pathway in the Perioperative Management of Peptic Perforation - A Randomized Control Trail (TUBELESS TRAIL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRan2022 to 2023Enrolled92ConditionsPerforated Peptic Ulcer, Fast Track Surgery, Perforated Bowel, Post-Op ComplicationArmsERAS protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk factors associated with morbidity and mortality in emergency colorectal cancer resections.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Impact of emergency presentation on early surgical and oncological outcomes in rectosigmoid cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Time trends in the incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection by indication and operative technique.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Varut LohsiriwatDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. bolloon@hotmail.com.
Romyen JitmungnganDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a multidisciplinary program designed to minimize stress response to surgery and promote the recovery of organ function, has become a standard of perioperative care for elective colorectal surgery. In an elective setting, ERAS program has consistently been shown to decrease postoperative complication, reduce length of hospital stay, shorten convalescence, and lower healthcare cost. Recently, there is emerging evidence that ERAS program can be safely and effectively applied to patients with emergency colorectal conditions such as acute colonic obstruction and intraabdominal infection. This review comprehensively covers the concept and application of ERAS program for emergency colorectal surgery. The outcomes of ERAS program for this emergency surgery are summarized as follows: (1) The ERAS program was associated with a lower rate of overall complication and shorter length of hospital stay - without increased risks of readmission, reoperation and death after emergency colorectal surgery; and (2) Compliance with an ERAS program in emergency setting appeared to be lower than that in an elective basis. Moreover, scientific evidence of each ERAS item used in emergency colorectal operation is shown. Perspectives of ERAS pathway in emergency colorectal surgery are addressed. Finally, evidence-based ERAS protocol for emergency colorectal surgery is presented.

Indexed as

ColonColonic obstructionDiverticulitisEmergencyEnhanced recovery after surgeryGuidelineIntraabdominal infectionRectumReviewSurgery

Identifiers

PMID30842811
PMCPMC6397799
OpenAlexW2916038135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.