Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842753›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2019

Valproate MHRA Guidance: Limitations and Opportunities.

Lance Watkins, Hannah Cock, Heather Angus-Leppan, Kim Morley, Mike Wilcock, Rohit Shankar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Are female bipolar patients of reproductive age aware of the teratogenic risk of sodium valproate? A qualitative study.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lance WatkinsMental Health and Learning Disability Delivery Unit, Llwyneryr Unit, Neath Port Talbot CLDT, Abertawe Bro Morgannwyg University Health Board, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Hannah CockAtkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Heather Angus-LeppanEpilepsy Initiative Group, Royal Free London, London, United Kingdom.
Kim MorleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Mike WilcockRoyal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, Truro, United Kingdom.
Rohit ShankarCornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Threemilestone Industrial Estate, Truro, United Kingdom.
Royal Cornwall Hospital · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBRoyal Hampshire County Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent publication of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom has strengthened the regulatory measures for valproate medicines. It highlights the importance of making women of childbearing age with epilepsy aware of the teratogenic risks of valproate and encourages the withdrawal of it from those currently prescribed. While a significant directive, it raises concerns of not having considered the impact on special populations such as women with Intellectual Disability (ID). While it is important that women with ID are not excluded from such safety initiatives, due caution needs to be taken on a case by case basis preferably, to ensure their best interests are central to the decision making. Many women with moderate to profound ID cannot have informed consented sexual relationships not to mention cognitive incapability to make informed choices on medication suitability. These women are at potential risk of having their epilepsy control undermined due to the MHRA directives. Around 30% of people with moderate to profound ID have seizures of which 60% are considered treatment resistant. In this vulnerable population changes to medication without clear clinical and social insights could lead to increased harm levels. This paper enumerates the challenges of application of the new directive to these special populations and proposes a pathway based on individual cognitive ability to provide informed consent to facilitate the continuation or removal of valproate. It is important not to lose sight of individual circumstances and the importance of working collaboratively toward providing person center care.

Indexed as

communicationintellectual disabilitypregnancyrisk assessmentvalproate

Identifiers

PMID30842753
PMCPMC6391862
OpenAlexW2916597392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.