Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842717›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health sciences

Effect of chlorhexidine cord application on prevention of neonatal sepsis in developing countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tilayie Feto Gelano, Yadeta Dassie Bacha, Degu Abate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tilayie Feto GelanoDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Yadeta Dassie BachaDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Degu AbateDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Medical Laboratory, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this review was to identify the pooled effect of chlorhexidine cord application on prevention of neonatal sepsis in developing countries.

methodsWe have conducted systemic review and meta-analysis. Articles were searched from electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), and other sources such as direct Google search, Google Scholar, and POPline. Only randomized controlled trial studies were considered for this review. The effect of chlorhexidine cord application on prevention of neonatal sepsis and mortality was assessed as compared to dry cord care.

resultsFive studies from developing countries were included in the review with a total of 129,293 participants. Pooled result of meta-analysis showed that chlorhexidine cord application reduces neonatal sepsis by 32% as compared to dry cord care (relative risk [RR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.81, random effect model, I

conclusionsChlorhexidine cord application significantly reduces neonatal sepsis and mortality in developing countries. Therefore, we stress the importance of including chlorhexidine cord application into the essential newborn care in the setting with high burden of neonatal mortality. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO with registration number CRD 42018089204.

Indexed as

Chlorhexidineneonatal mortalityneonatal sepsisumbilical cord care

Identifiers

PMID30842717
PMCPMC6392487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.