ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019
Characterizing the learning curve of MRI-US fusion prostate biopsies.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06360523 (ProstateAI - A Prospective Paired Validating Cohort Study to Evaluate an MRI-based Optimized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway Powered by Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ProstateAI - A Prospective Paired Validating Cohort Study to Evaluate an MRI-based Optimized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway Powered by Artificial Intelligence
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate cancer detection and complications of MRI-targeted prostate biopsy using cognitive registration, software-assisted image fusion or in-bore guidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.European urology oncology · 2020Pooled it
- The learning curve for robotic-assisted transperineal MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- The Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Detection.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Procedure efficiency and diagnostic outcomes during the learning curve of transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Comparison of software vs. cognitive-based fusion-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Early clinical experience and learning curve of transperineal prostate biopsy with a novel angle-adjustable needle guide.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Observational
- Perspective transition from transrectal to transperineal MRI-fusion biopsy under local anesthesia - the institutional TREXIT learning curve of the new gold standard.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Micro-Ultrasound in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison with Multiparametric MRI.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Targeting All Multiple Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Lesions Does Not Enhance Cancer Detection: Insights from the YAU Prostate Cancer Group.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Optimal approach for MRI-targeted prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer: transperineal or transrectal?Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Impact of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prostate Cancer Detection in Switzerland.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Article
- Fusion MRI/Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Biopsy: A Game Changer in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Expect the unexpected: investigating discordant prostate MRI and biopsy results.European radiology · 2024Article
- Impact of operator expertise on transperineal free-hand mpMRI-fusion-targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicenter prospective learning curve.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- The impact of a second MRI and re-biopsy in patients with initial negative mpMRI-targeted and systematic biopsy for PIRADS ≥ 3 lesions.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Does experience change the role of systematic biopsy during MRI-fusion biopsy of the prostate?World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Learning curve for magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting prostate cancer using cumulative sum analysis.Current urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMRI-US fusion prostate biopsies are becoming a common procedure to diagnose prostate cancer. There is a paucity of information regarding the learning curve for fusion biopsies. We aim to study the amount of experience needed to be both accurate and time-efficient in this procedure.
methodsWe prospectively collected data on all MRI-US fusion biopsies performed from April 2014 to August 2017. We used two parameters to define the learning curve. Process Measurement (efficiency) was measured by time from the beginning of anesthesia to end of procedure. Outcome Measurement (accuracy) was measured by cancer detection rate for PI-RAD 3 lesions. The end of the learning curve was defined graphically and mathematically. We performed a separate analysis for transrectal and transperineal biopsies.
resultsWe completed 779 fusion biopsies (523 transrectal, 256 transperineal). Patients median age was 66 years (IQR 61-70) and median PSA 6.95 ng/ml (IQR 4.2-10.6). Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 385 (49%). Process Measurement-Procedure time decreased from 45 min in the first transrectal fusion biopsy to 15 min after 109 biopsies and remained stable (p < 0.0001). Time decreased from 55 min in the first transperineal biopsy to 18 min after 124 biopsies (p < 0.0001). Outcome Measurement-In transrectal fusion-biopsies detection rate for PI-RADS 3 lesions increased from 35 to 50% after 104 biopsies. In transperineal fusion-biopsies, detection rate increased from 40 to 55% after 119 cases for PI-RADS 3 lesions.
conclusionsWe measured the learning curve of fusion biopsies graphically and mathematically. We demonstrated that proficiency occurs after 110 transrectal and 125 transperineal fusion-biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.