Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Deciphering host-parasitoid interactions and parasitism rates of crop pests using DNA metabarcoding.

Ahmadou Sow, Thierry Brévault, Laure Benoit, Marie-Pierre Chapuis, Maxime Galan, Armelle Coeur d'acier, Gérard Delvare, Mbacké Sembène, Julien Haran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contamination Survey of Insect Genomic and Transcriptomic Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmadou SowDépartement de Biologie Animale, FST-UCAD, Dakar, Senegal. s_ahmadou@yahoo.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8987-4828
Thierry BrévaultBIOPASS, CIRAD-IRD-ISRA-UCAD, Dakar, Senegal.
Laure BenoitCIRAD, CBGP, Montpellier, France.
Marie-Pierre ChapuisCIRAD, CBGP, Montpellier, France.
Maxime GalanCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Armelle Coeur d'acierCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Gérard DelvareCIRAD, CBGP, Montpellier, France.
Mbacké SembèneDépartement de Biologie Animale, FST-UCAD, Dakar, Senegal.
Julien HaranCIRAD, CBGP, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate estimation of parasitism rates and diversity of parasitoids of crop insect pests is a prerequisite for exploring processes leading to efficient natural biocontrol. Traditional methods such as rearing have been often limited by taxonomic identification, insect mortality and intensive work, but the advent of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) techniques, such as DNA metabarcoding, is increasingly seen as a reliable and powerful alternative approach. Little has been done to explore the benefits of such an approach for estimating parasitism rates and parasitoid diversity in an agricultural context. In this study, we compared the composition of parasitoid species and parasitism rates between rearing and DNA metabarcoding of host eggs and larvae of the millet head miner, Heliocheilus albipunctella De Joannis (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), collected from millet fields in Senegal. We first assessed the detection threshold for the main ten endoparasitoids, by sequencing PCR products obtained from artificial dilution gradients of the parasitoid DNAs in the host moth. We then assessed the potential of DNA metabarcoding for diagnosing parasitism rates in samples collected from the field. Under controlled conditions, our results showed that relatively small quantities of parasitoid DNA (0.07 ng) were successfully detected within an eight-fold larger quantity of host DNA. Parasitoid diversity and parasitism rate estimates were always higher for DNA metabarcoding than for host rearing. Furthermore, metabarcoding detected multi-parasitism, cryptic parasitoid species and differences in parasitism rates between two different sampling sites. Metabarcoding shows promise for gaining a clearer understanding of the importance and complexity of host-parasitoid interactions in agro-ecosystems, with a view to improving pest biocontrol strategies.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalHost-Parasite InteractionsInsectaSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID30842584
PMCPMC6403368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.