Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842504›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition.

Harumi Ohno, Haruka Murakami, Kumpei Tanisawa, Kana Konishi, Motohiko Miyachi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the Effect ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harumi OhnoDepartment of Physical Activity Research, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, NIBIOHN, Tokyo, 162-8636, Japan.
Haruka MurakamiDepartment of Physical Activity Research, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, NIBIOHN, Tokyo, 162-8636, Japan.
Kumpei TanisawaDepartment of Physical Activity Research, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, NIBIOHN, Tokyo, 162-8636, Japan.
Kana KonishiDepartment of Physical Activity Research, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, NIBIOHN, Tokyo, 162-8636, Japan.
Motohiko MiyachiDepartment of Physical Activity Research, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, NIBIOHN, Tokyo, 162-8636, Japan. miyachi@nibiohn.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-1146-0905
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faecal volume, form, colour, and odour are associated with various diseases, dietary habits, and the gut microbiome. Multifaceted assessment of faecal condition will be needed for future research and practice. Faecal observation has advantages, as it is non-invasive, frequent, and easy. We have developed and validated an illustrative card tool for comprehensively faecal assessment. In 38 healthy adults, observations of volume, form, colour, and odour of faeces using the tool were compared to the objective characteristics of the actual faeces determined using a weighing scale, moisture meter, hardness meter, colourimeter, and odour measuring device. A significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.778) was observed between the number of faecal model (2 cm × 10 cm) units and the actual weight. The Bristol Stool Form Scale showed a significant positive correlation with the moisture content (ρ = 0.717) and negative correlations with faecal hardness (ρ = -0.843) and adhesiveness (ρ = -0.761). The L*a*b* colour space values of the stool differed significantly among observational judgments using the colour card tool. No significant correlation was observed between the observation of odour and the measured odour index. In conclusion, the faecal volume, form, and colour can be estimated by observation using the multifaceted assessment card tool.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdorantsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30842504
PMCPMC6403287
OpenAlexW2920631963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.