Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Increasing predation risk with light reduces speed, exploration and visit duration of invasive ship rats (Rattus rattus).

Bridgette Farnworth, Richard Meitern, John Innes, Joseph R Waas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barn owls exert top-down effects on the abundance and behavior of rodent pests.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bridgette FarnworthBiological Sciences, School of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag, 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand. bridgette.farnworth@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2417-8968
Richard MeiternUniversity of Tartu, Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, Vanemuise 46, 51014, Tartu, Estonia.
John InnesManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Joseph R WaasBiological Sciences, School of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag, 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploiting predation cues to deter pests remains an untapped management tool for conservationists. We examined foraging and movement patterns of 20 wild ship rats (Rattus rattus) within a large, outdoor 'U maze' that was either illuminated or dark to assess if light (an indirect predation cue) could deter rodents from ecologically vulnerable locations. Light did not alter rats' foraging behaviour (latency to approach seed tray, visits to seed tray, time per visit to seed tray, total foraging duration, foraging rate) within the experimental resource patch but three of seven movement behaviours were significantly impaired (53% fewer visits to the maze, 70% less exploration within the maze, 40% slower movement within the maze). The total time males spent exposed to illumination also declined by 45 minutes per night, unlike females. Individual visits tended to be longer under illumination, but the latency to visit and the latency to cross through the U maze were unaffected by illumination. Elevating predation risk with illumination may be a useful pest management technique for reducing ship rat activity, particularly in island ecosystems where controlling mammalian predators is paramount to preserving biodiversity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalCuesEcologyEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFemaleIntroduced SpeciesLightMalePest ControlPredatory BehaviorRats

Identifiers

PMID30842448
PMCPMC6403350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.