Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842284›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.

A Zeynep Enkavi, Ian W Eisenberg, Patrick G Bissett, Gina L Mazza, David P MacKinnon, Lisa A Marsch, Russell A Poldrack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 228 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Social information creates self-fulfilling prophecies in judgments of pain, vicarious pain, and cognitive effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Zeynep EnkaviDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; zenkavi@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-3620
Ian W EisenbergDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Patrick G BissettDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Gina L MazzaDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259.
David P MacKinnonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Lisa A MarschGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulationUH2DA041713 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MARSCH, LISA A., POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2015 to 2017
$2.8M
Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulationUH3DA041713 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MARSCH, LISA A., POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2018 to 2019
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NIDA NIH HHS UH2 DA041713NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA041713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to regulate behavior in service of long-term goals is a widely studied psychological construct known as self-regulation. This wide interest is in part due to the putative relations between self-regulation and a range of real-world behaviors. Self-regulation is generally viewed as a trait, and individual differences are quantified using a diverse set of measures, including self-report surveys and behavioral tasks. Accurate characterization of individual differences requires measurement reliability, a property frequently characterized in self-report surveys, but rarely assessed in behavioral tasks. We remedy this gap by (

Indexed as

Self-ControlHumansIndividualityModels, StatisticalPsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsSelf Reportindividual differencesretest reliabilityself-regulation

Identifiers

PMID30842284
PMCPMC6431228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.