Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842267›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Native and Invading Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) Microbiomes Differ in Composition and Diversity of Bacteria.

Patricia Lu-Irving, Julia G Harenčár, Hailey Sounart, Shana R Welles, Sarah M Swope, David A Baltrus, Katrina M Dlugosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Rhizosphere Microbiome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia Lu-IrvingDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA patricia.luirving@rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1116-9402
Julia G HarenčárDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6944-4337
Hailey SounartDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Shana R WellesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5743-0576
Sarah M SwopeDepartment of Biology, Mills College, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7365-5188
David A BaltrusSchool of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-9551
Katrina M DlugoschDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7302-6637

Funding

Genomics Resources Core (GRC)P30GM103324 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI SETTLES, MATTHEW · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive species could benefit from being introduced to locations with more favorable species interactions, including the loss of enemies, the gain of mutualists, or the simplification of complex interaction networks. Microbiomes are an important source of species interactions with strong fitness effects on multicellular organisms, and these interactions are known to vary across regions. The highly invasive plant yellow starthistle (

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMicrobiotaBacteriaCaliforniaCentaureaEuropeGenetics, PopulationGenotypeGeographyIntroduced SpeciesRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial communitiesinvasive speciesphyllosphereplant microbiomesrhizospherespecies introductions

Identifiers

PMID30842267
PMCPMC6403453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.