Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841902›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2019

Mathematical modeling of septic shock based on clinical data.

Yukihiro Yamanaka, Kenko Uchida, Momoka Akashi, Yuta Watanabe, Arino Yaguchi, Shuji Shimamoto, Shingo Shimoda, Hitoshi Yamada, Masashi Yamashita, Hidenori Kimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yukihiro YamanakaWaseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenko UchidaWaseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Momoka AkashiWaseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta WatanabeWaseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Arino YaguchiTokyo Women's Medical University, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji ShimamotoTokyo Women's Medical University, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo ShimodaInstitute of Physical and Chemical Research, Moriyama-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Hitoshi YamadaToyota Motor Corporation, 1, Toyota-cho, Toyoda, Japan.
Masashi YamashitaToyota Motor Corporation, 1, Toyota-cho, Toyoda, Japan.
Hidenori KimuraWaseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan. hkimura@brain.riken.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMathematical models of diseases may provide a unified approach for establishing effective treatment strategies based on fundamental pathophysiology. However, models that are useful for clinical practice must overcome the massive complexity of human physiology and the diversity of patients' environmental conditions. With the aim of modeling a complex disease, we choose sepsis, which is highly complex, life-threatening systemic disease with high mortality. In particular, we focused on septic shock, a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory and cellular/metabolic abnormalities are profound enough to substantially increase mortality. Our model includes cardiovascular, immune, nervous system models and a pharmacological model as submodels and integrates them to create a sepsis model based on pathological facts.

resultsModel validation was done in two steps. First, we established a model for a standard patient in order to confirm the validity of our approach in general aspects. For this, we checked the correspondence between the severity of infection defined in terms of pathogen growth rate and the ease of recovery defined in terms of the intensity of treatment required for recovery. The simulations for a standard patient showed good correspondence. We then applied the same simulations to a patient with heart failure as an underlying disease. The model showed that spontaneous recovery would not occur without treatment, even for a very mild infection. This is consistent with clinical experience. We next validated the model using clinical data of three sepsis patients. The model parameters were tuned for these patients based on the model for the standard patient used in the first part of the validation. In these cases, the simulations agreed well with clinical data. In fact, only a handful parameters need to be tuned for the simulations to match with the data.

conclusionsWe have constructed a model of septic shock and have shown that it can reproduce well the time courses of treatment and disease progression. Tuning of model parameters for each patient could be easily done. This study demonstrates the feasibility of disease models, suggesting the possibility of clinical use in the prediction of disease progression, decisions on the timing of drug dosages, and the estimation of time of infection.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisModels, TheoreticalBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeart RateHumansNorepinephrineShock, SepticNorepinephrineBlood pressureImmune systemInflammationModel-based therapySeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID30841902
PMCPMC6404291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.