Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841900›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2019

Exploring the space for task shifting to support nursing on neonatal wards in Kenyan public hospitals.

Jacinta Nzinga, Jacob McKnight, Joyline Jepkosgei, Mike English

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacinta NzingaHealth services and Research Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 43640, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya. jnzinga@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-8857
Jacob McKnightNuffield Department of Medicine and Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joyline JepkosgeiHealth services and Research Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 43640, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Mike EnglishHealth services and Research Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 43640, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M015386/1Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 097170Wellcome Trust 207522/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust MR/M015386/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing practice is a key driver of quality care and can influence newborn health outcomes where nurses are the primary care givers to this highly dependent group. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, nursing work environments are characterized by heavy workloads, insufficient staffing and regular medical emergencies, which compromise the ability of nurses to provide quality care. Task shifting has been promoted as one strategy for making efficient use of human resources and addressing these issues. AIMS AND

objectivesWe aimed to understand the nature and practice of neonatal nursing in public hospitals in Nairobi so as to determine what prospect there might be for relieving pressure by shifting nurses' work to others.

methodsThis paper is based on an 18-month qualitative study of three newborn units of three public hospitals-all located in Nairobi county-using an ethnographic approach. We draw upon a mix of 32 interviews, over 250 h' observations, field notes and informal conversations. Data were collected from senior nursing experts in newborn nursing, neonatal nurse in-charges, neonatal nurses, nursing students and support staff.

resultsTo cope with difficult work conditions characterized by resource challenges and competing priorities, nurses have developed a ritualized schedule and a form of 'subconscious triage'. Informal, organic task shifting was already taking place whereby particular nursing tasks were delegated to students, mothers and support staff, often without any structured supervision. Despite this practice, nurses were agnostic about formal institutionalization of task shifting due to concerns around professional boundaries and the practicality of integrating a new cadre into an already stressed health system.

conclusionOur findings revealed a routine template of neonatal nursing work which nurses used to control unpredictability. We found that this model of nursing encouraged delegation of less technical tasks to subordinates, parents and other staff through the process of 'subconscious triage'. The rich insights we gained from this organic form of task shifting can inform more formal task-shifting projects as they seek to identify tasks most easily delegated, and how best to support and work with busy nurses.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalHospitals, PublicInfant CareNursesNursing AssistantsPediatric NursingWorkloadAttitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CareHospital DepartmentsHumansInfant, NewbornKenyaModels, NursingNursing Staff, HospitalParentsDelegationLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs)Neonatal nursingRoutinesSubconscious triageSupervisionTask sharingTask shifting

Identifiers

PMID30841900
PMCPMC6404312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.