Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841897›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Orthopedic surgeons' views on the osteoporosis care gap and potential solutions: survey results.

David W Barton, Daniel C Griffin, Jonathan J Carmouche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Osteoporosis management and secondary fragility fracture rates in patients with multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. How can the orthopedic surgeon ensure optimal vitamin D status in patients operated for an osteoporotic fracture?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David W BartonVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA. DaBarton@VT.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-4942
Daniel C GriffinVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.
Jonathan J CarmoucheVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.

Funding

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoporosis is often not recognized until one or more fractures occur, yet post-fracture screening remains uncommon. Orthopedic surgeons are well situated to address this care gap. Both a protocol-based approach and fracture liaison services (FLS) have been proposed. The present surveys assess orthopedists' attitudes to these alternative models for addressing this care gap.

methodsTwo digital surveys were sent to all orthopedic surgeons and orthopedic midlevel providers at a large level 1 trauma center 1.5 years apart.

resultsThirty-six of 47 survey recipients (77%) responded to the first survey; all 55 recipients (100%) responded to the second. Respondents recognized the importance of osteoporosis care, the inadequacy of current measures, and the potential of orthopedic surgeons to help address this gap. Respondents reported regular encounters with fragility fracture patients but limited familiarity with core aspects of osteoporosis screening and treatment, especially pharmacotherapy. While some respondents (40%) reported willingness to attempt a protocol-based approach to addressing this care gap, many others expressed reservations (60%) and support for a FLS-based approach was much higher (95%).

conclusionsA fracture liaison service model best fits the observed attitudes of orthopedic surgeons at this level 1 trauma center relative to a protocol-based approach. Protocol-based approaches may be preferable in alternate settings.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesHumansOrthopedic SurgeonsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesQuality of Health CareSecondary PreventionVitamin DVitamin DFLSFracture liaison serviceFracture preventionFragility fractureOsteoporosisProtocolQuality improvementSurvey

Identifiers

PMID30841897
PMCPMC6402163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.