ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Positive-unlabelled learning of glycosylation sites in the human proteome.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Yield Prediction of Organic Reactions in Biased Data Sets via Positive-Unlabeled Learning.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- DPAS: disease-associated peptide anomaly score for identifying pathogenic peptides via one-class learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- NEU1-Mediated Extracellular Vesicle Glycosylation in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanistic Insights into Intercellular Communication and Therapeutic Targeting.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Learning peptide properties with positive examples only.Digital discovery · 2024Article
- csORF-finder: an effective ensemble learning framework for accurate identification of multi-species coding short open reading frames.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in the analysis of glycosylation data.Biotechnology advances · 2022Review
- PCfun: a hybrid computational framework for systematic characterization of protein complex function.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- m5Cpred-XS: A New Method for Predicting RNA m5C Sites Based on XGBoost and SHAP.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- An analytical study on the identification of N-linked glycosylation sites using machine learning model.PeerJ. Computer science · 2022Article
- Bioinformatic Analyses of Peroxiredoxins and RF-Prx: A Random Forest-Based Predictor and Classifier for Prxs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Computational analysis and prediction of PE_PGRS proteins using machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Computational identification of eukaryotic promoters based on cascaded deep capsule neural networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Large-scale comparative review and assessment of computational methods for anti-cancer peptide identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- DeepTorrent: a deep learning-based approach for predicting DNA N4-methylcytosine sites.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Computational prediction and interpretation of both general and specific types of promoters in Escherichia coli by exploiting a stacked ensemble-learning framework.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- An Interpretable Prediction Model for Identifying NMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Immunopeptidomic Analysis Reveals That Deamidated HLA-bound Peptides Arise Predominantly from Deglycosylated Precursors.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Article
- PRISMOID: a comprehensive 3D structure database for post-translational modifications and mutations with functional impact.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Computational Identification of Lysine Glutarylation Sites Using Positive-Unlabeled Learning.Current genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs an important type of post-translational modification (PTM), protein glycosylation plays a crucial role in protein stability and protein function. The abundance and ubiquity of protein glycosylation across three domains of life involving Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea demonstrate its roles in regulating a variety of signalling and metabolic pathways. Mutations on and in the proximity of glycosylation sites are highly associated with human diseases. Accordingly, accurate prediction of glycosylation can complement laboratory-based methods and greatly benefit experimental efforts for characterization and understanding of functional roles of glycosylation. For this purpose, a number of supervised-learning approaches have been proposed to identify glycosylation sites, demonstrating a promising predictive performance. To train a conventional supervised-learning model, both reliable positive and negative samples are required. However, in practice, a large portion of negative samples (i.e. non-glycosylation sites) are mislabelled due to the limitation of current experimental technologies. Moreover, supervised algorithms often fail to take advantage of large volumes of unlabelled data, which can aid in model learning in conjunction with positive samples (i.e. experimentally verified glycosylation sites).
resultsIn this study, we propose a positive unlabelled (PU) learning-based method, PA2DE (V2.0), based on the AlphaMax algorithm for protein glycosylation site prediction. The predictive performance of this proposed method was evaluated by a range of glycosylation data collected over a ten-year period based on an interval of three years. Experiments using both benchmarking and independent tests show that our method outperformed the representative supervised-learning algorithms (including support vector machines and random forests) and one-class learners, as well as currently available prediction methods in terms of F1 score, accuracy and AUC measures. In addition, we developed an online web server as an implementation of the optimized model (available at http://glycomine.erc.monash.edu/Lab/GlycoMine_PU/ ) to facilitate community-wide efforts for accurate prediction of protein glycosylation sites.
conclusionThe proposed PU learning approach achieved a competitive predictive performance compared with currently available methods. This PU learning schema may also be effectively employed and applied to address the prediction problems of other important types of protein PTM site and functional sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.