Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841739›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2019

Proof of Concept Study to Assess the Influence of Oxygen Partial Pressure in Capillary Blood on SMBG Measurements.

Annette Baumstark, Stefan Pleus, Nina Jendrike, Christina Liebing, Rolf Hinzmann, Cornelia Haug, Guido Freckmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annette BaumstarkInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Stefan PleusInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-7754
Nina JendrikeInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Christina LiebingInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Rolf HinzmannRoche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Cornelia HaugInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Guido FreckmannInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-9529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement results provided by blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMS) can be affected by various influencing factors. For some BGMS using glucose oxidase (GOx)-based test strips, one of these factors is the oxygen partial pressure (pO

methodInfluence of pO

resultsThe relative bias between the lowest and highest pO

conclusionsThis proof of concept study showed that with the procedures used, a potentially clinically relevant influence of pO

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Gas AnalysisBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenProof of Concept StudyYoung AdultBlood GlucoseOxygenblood glucose monitoring systemglucose oxidasepartial pressure of oxygenself-monitoring of blood glucose

Identifiers

PMID30841739
PMCPMC6835173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.