Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841721›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Optimal Timing and Early Intervention With Anticoagulant Therapy for Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Kazuma Yamakawa, Yutaka Umemura, Shuhei Murao, Mineji Hayakawa, Satoshi Fujimi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuma Yamakawa1 Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2999-4021
Yutaka Umemura2 Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Shuhei Murao1 Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, Japan.
Mineji Hayakawa3 Emergency and Critical Care Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoshi Fujimi1 Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing diagnostic criteria to detect specific patients likely to benefit from anticoagulants is warranted. A cutoff of 5 points for the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scoring system was determined in the original article, but its validity was not evaluated. This study aimed to explore the optimal cutoff points of DIC scoring systems and evaluate the effectiveness of early intervention with anticoagulants. We used a nationwide retrospective registry of consecutive adult patients with sepsis in Japan to develop simulated survival data, assuming anticoagulants were conducted strictly according to each cutoff point. Estimated treatment effects of anticoagulants for in-hospital mortality and risk of bleeding were calculated by logistic regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scoring. Of 2663 patients with sepsis, 1247 patients received anticoagulants and 1416 none. The simulation model showed no increase in estimated mortality between 0 and 3 cutoff points, whereas at ≥4 cutoff points, mortality increased linearly. The estimated bleeding tended to decrease in accordance with the increase in cutoff points. The optimal cutoff for determining anticoagulant therapy may be 3 points to minimize nonsurvival with acceptable bleeding complications. The findings of the present study suggested a beneficial association of early intervention with anticoagulant therapy and mortality in the patients with sepsis-induced DIC. Present cutoff points of DIC scoring systems may be suboptimal for determining the start of anticoagulant therapy and delay its initiation.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsDisseminated Intravascular CoagulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSepsisAnticoagulantsanticoagulantscoagulopathycritically illdiagnostic criteriaDICseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID30841721
PMCPMC6714922
OpenAlexW2922149602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.