Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841644›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Maladaptive Rumination as a Transdiagnostic Mediator of Vulnerability and Outcome in Psychopathology.

Maria Luca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comment to the article titled: "Autonomic nervous system function in women with anorexia nervosa" by Jenkins and coll.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Candidate Biomarkers of Suicide Crisis Syndrome: What to Test Next? A Concept Paper.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria LucaDepartment of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95125 Catania, Italy. lucmaria@tiscali.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5935-8283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaladaptive rumination is a form of negative repetitive thinking which has attracted the interest of researchers, as it is considered a cognitive vulnerability to depression. Some of the original beliefs regarding rumination, in particular its exclusive link with depression, have been questioned in the light of research findings. At present, the very concept of rumination is still unclear, so research has been investigating this topic from different, and somewhat inconsistent, perspectives.

methodsA literature review was performed in order to outline some core characteristics of rumination, explain its determinants, and discuss its possible role as a transdiagnostic mediator of vulnerability and outcome in psychopathology.

resultsMaladaptive rumination could be interpreted as a dysfunctional coping strategy strictly linked to emotion regulation and metacognition that may occur in several psychopathological conditions, such as psychosis, eating disorders, and alcohol dependence.

conclusionEvidence allows the interpretation of maladaptive rumination as a transdiagnostic mediator of vulnerability and outcome in psychopathology. Therefore, investigating it from a dimensional perspective may represent a valid research strategy.

Indexed as

alcohol dependenceeating disordersemotion regulationmetacognitionpsychopathologypsychosisrumination

Identifiers

PMID30841644
PMCPMC6463018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.