Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30841494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feeding of a Wood-Chipper.

Margherita Micheletti Cremasco, Ambra Giustetto, Federica Caffaro, Andrea Colantoni, Eugenio Cavallo, Stefano Grigolato

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Decision Tree Model for Analysis and Judgment of Lower Limb Movement Comfort Level.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Musculoskeletal Risks: RULA Bibliometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  18. An Overview of REBA Method Applications in the World.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  19. Tailoring Safety Training Material to Migrant Farmworkers: An Ergonomic User-Centred Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Margherita Micheletti CremascoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy. margherita.micheletti@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5948-7584
Ambra GiustettoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy. ambra.giustetto@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9757-569X
Federica CaffaroInstitute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines (IMAMOTER), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Strada delle Cacce, 73, 10135 Torino, Italy. f.caffaro@ima.to.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3911-5924
Andrea ColantoniDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy. colantoni@unitus.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5330-6076
Eugenio CavalloInstitute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines (IMAMOTER), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Strada delle Cacce, 73, 10135 Torino, Italy. eugenio.cavallo@cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-9629
Stefano GrigolatoDepartment of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35040 Padova, Italy. stefano.grigolato@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2089-3892
Accademia Albertina delle Belle Arti · ITInstitute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines · ITUniversità degli Studi della Tuscia · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of the postural attitude of workers during the interaction with workstation's elements and working environment is essential in the evaluation and prevention of biomechanical overload risk in workplaces. RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) and REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) are the two easiest methods for postural risk assessment in the workplace. Few studies investigated postural risk in forestry sector with regard to human⁻machine interaction, in particular manually fed wood-chippers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postures assumed by an operator during the manual feeding of a wood-chipper, and to compare RULA and REBA, in order to identify the more effective and appropriate method for the assessment of the risk of biomechanical postural overload. The results pointed out several postural issues of the upper limbs, and showed that RULA is a more precautionary method to protect operator's health during the targeted tasks. Implications to improve the human⁻wood-chipper interaction are discussed.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsMusculoskeletal DiseasesForestryHumansMalePostureRisk AssessmentUpper ExtremityWoodWorkplaceergonomicsforestrypostural risk assessmentREBARULAwood-chipper

Identifiers

PMID30841494
PMCPMC6427467
OpenAlexW2918533503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.