Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

"She's gone now." A mixed methods analysis of the experiences and perceptions around the deaths of children who died unexpectedly in health care facilities in Cape Town, South Africa.

Peter Hodkinson, Jessica Price, Caroline Croxson, Lee Wallis, Alison Ward, Andrew Argent, Stephen Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter HodkinsonDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0376-7982
Jessica PriceNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4020-6850
Caroline CroxsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lee WallisDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alison WardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andrew ArgentDepartment of Paediatrics University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stephen ReidDirectorate of Primary Health Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT091107MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe sudden death of a child is a catastrophic event for both the family and the healthcare workers involved. Confidential enquiries provide a biomedical depiction of the processes and quality of care delivered and drive improvements in care. However, these rarely include an assessment of the patient/caregiver experience which is increasingly regarded as a key measure of quality of care.

methodsA parallel convergent mixed methods design was used to compare and contrast medically-assessed clinical quality of care with caregiver perceptions of quality and care in a cohort of sudden childhood deaths in emergency facilities in Cape Town, South Africa.

resultsAmongst the 29 sudden childhood deaths, clinical quality of care was assessed as poor in 11 (38%) and the death was considered avoidable or potentially avoidable in 16 (55%). The main themes identified from the caregivers were their perception of the quality of care delivered (driven by perceived healthcare worker effort, empathy and promptness), the way the family was dealt with during the final resuscitation, and communications at the time of and after the death. Ten (35%) caregivers were predominantly negative about the care delivered, of whom four received fair clinical quality of care; 13 (49%) of caregivers had predominantly positive experiences, one of whom received poor clinical quality of care.

conclusionsCaregivers' experiences of the healthcare service around their child's death are influenced largely by the way healthcare workers communicate with them, as well as the perceived clinical effort. This is not always concordant with the clinically assessed quality of care. Simple interventions such as protocols and education of healthcare workers in dealing with families of a dying or deceased child could improve families' experiences at a time when they are most vulnerable.

Indexed as

Death, SuddenHealth FacilitiesCaregiversCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCommunicationDelivery of Health CareEmpathyFamilyFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID30840699
PMCPMC6402763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.