ArticlePloS one2019
Exploring the use of machine learning for risk adjustment: A comparison of standard and penalized linear regression models in predicting health care costs in older adults.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nursing Process Data for Health Care Cost Prediction Using Machine Learning: Longitudinal Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Observational
- A Multi-Schedule Machine Learning Pipeline for Medicare Reimbursement Change Prediction and Operational Risk Stratification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Improving Models to Predict Care Utilization Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Cross-sectional analysis of accuracy versus interpretability in Medicare Advantage risk adjustment.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Predicting the number of care beds for older people by a novel grey Verhulst cosine self-memory model: two case studies of Jiangsu and Shanghai, China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- The last human touch: why AI doesn't belong in life's defining moments.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Urinary Stone Disease: Development a Novel User-Friendly Tool.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs in patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a longitudinal analysis of health insurance claims data.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- What matters most? Identifying key resource gain and loss factors affecting nurses' work engagement and job burnout in digital healthcare contexts.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development of Smart pH-Sensitive Collagen-Hydroxyethylcellulose Films with Naproxen for Burn Wound Healing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Topical Biocomposites Based on Collagen, Hyaluronic Acid and Metronidazole as Periodontitis Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Variational Bayes machine learning for risk adjustment of general outcome indicators with examples in urology.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Performance of ChatGPT on the Chinese Postgraduate Examination for Clinical Medicine: Survey Study.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- How to mitigate the risks of deployment of artificial intelligence in medicine?Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Comparing risk adjustment estimation methods under data availability constraints.Health economics · 2022Article
- Improving the Prediction of Persistent High Health Care Utilizers: Retrospective Analysis Using Ensemble Methodology.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- LASSO Regression Modeling on Prediction of Medical Terms among Seafarers' Health Documents Using Tidy Text Mining.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Estimation and Prediction of Hospitalization and Medical Care Costs Using Regression in Machine Learning.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPayers and providers still primarily use ordinary least squares (OLS) to estimate expected economic and clinical outcomes for risk adjustment purposes. Penalized linear regression represents a practical and incremental step forward that provides transparency and interpretability within the familiar regression framework. This study conducted an in-depth comparison of prediction performance of standard and penalized linear regression in predicting future health care costs in older adults. METHODS AND
findingsThis retrospective cohort study included 81,106 Medicare Advantage patients with 5 years of continuous medical and pharmacy insurance from 2009 to 2013. Total health care costs in 2013 were predicted with comorbidity indicators from 2009 to 2012. Using 2012 predictors only, OLS performed poorly (e.g., R2 = 16.3%) compared to penalized linear regression models (R2 ranging from 16.8 to 16.9%); using 2009-2012 predictors, the gap in prediction performance increased (R2:15.0% versus 18.0-18.2%). OLS with a reduced set of predictors selected by lasso showed improved performance (R2 = 16.6% with 2012 predictors, 17.4% with 2009-2012 predictors) relative to OLS without variable selection but still lagged behind the prediction performance of penalized regression. Lasso regression consistently generated prediction ratios closer to 1 across different levels of predicted risk compared to other models.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the advantages of using transparent and easy-to-interpret penalized linear regression for predicting future health care costs in older adults relative to standard linear regression. Penalized regression showed better performance than OLS in predicting health care costs. Applying penalized regression to longitudinal data increased prediction accuracy. Lasso regression in particular showed superior prediction ratios across low and high levels of predicted risk. Health care insurers, providers and policy makers may benefit from adopting penalized regression such as lasso regression for cost prediction to improve risk adjustment and population health management and thus better address the underlying needs and risk of the populations they serve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.