SynthesisPloS one2019
How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cesarean delivery on maternal request and Robson classification.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section delivery: analysis from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Does community pressure matter in cesarean deliveries in Bangladesh? An analysis of nationally representative surveys.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Brazil: an analysis based on the perceptions of survivors of the placenta accreta spectrum.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Observational
- Article
- Article
- Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Article
- The development and the psychometric evaluation of the Adolescents Intentions towards the Birth Options Scale in Greek.European journal of midwifery · 2022Article
- Students' Attitudes Towards Birth Decisions.Maedica · 2021Article
- 'A caesarean section is like you've never delivered a baby': A mixed methods study of the experience of childbirth among French women.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2021Article
- Trend and Sociodemographic Correlates of Cesarean Section Utilization in Nepal: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys 2006-2016.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Caesarean section in Benin and Mali: increased recourse to technology due to suffering and under-resourced facilities.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2020Article
- On-demand cesarean section: assessing trends and socioeconomic disparities.Revista de saude publica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and since the 2000s, several researchers have investigated women's demand for caesarean sections. QUESTION: The aim of this article was to review and summarise published studies investigating caesarean section demand and to describe the methodologies, outcomes, country characteristics and country income levels in these studies.
methodsThis is a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2017 in French and English that quantitatively measured women's demand for caesarean sections. We carried out a systematic search using the Medline database in PubMed.
findingsThe search strategy identified 390 studies, 41 of which met the final inclusion criteria, representing a total sample of 3 774 458 women. We identified two different study designs, i.e., cross-sectional studies and prospective cohort studies, that are commonly used to measure social demand for caesarean sections. Two different types of outcomes were reported, i.e., the preferences of pregnant or non-pregnant women regarding the method of childbirth in the future and caesarean delivery following maternal request. No study measured demand for caesarean section during the childbirth process. All included studies were conducted in middle- (n = 24) and high-income countries (n = 17), and no study performed in a low-income country was found. DISCUSSION: Measuring caesarean section demand is challenging, and the structural violence leading to demand for caesarean section during childbirth while in the labour ward remains invisible. In addition, the caesarean section demand in low-income countries remains unclear due to the lack of studies conducted in these countries.
conclusionWe recommend conducting prospective cohort studies to describe the social construction of caesarean section demand. We also recommend conducting studies in low-income countries because demand for caesarean sections in these countries is rarely investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.