Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Combining biophysical parameters, spectral indices and multivariate hyperspectral models for estimating yield and water productivity of spring wheat across different agronomic practices.

Salah El-Hendawy, Nasser Al-Suhaibani, Salah Elsayed, Yahya Refay, Majed Alotaibi, Yaser Hassan Dewir, Wael Hassan, Urs Schmidhalter

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salah El-HendawyDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8104-3410
Nasser Al-SuhaibaniDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salah ElsayedEvaluation of Natural Resources Department, Environmental Studies and Research Institute, Sadat City University, Menoufia, Egypt.
Yahya RefayDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majed AlotaibiDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yaser Hassan DewirDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-8137
Wael HassanDepartment of Biology, College of Science and Humanities at Quwayiah, Shaqra University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-9606
Urs SchmidhalterChair of Plant Nutrition, Department of Plant Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, Freising, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manipulating plant densities under different irrigation rates can have a significant impact on grain yield and water use efficiency by exerting positive or negative effects on ET. Whereas traditional spectral reflectance indices (SRIs) have been used to assess biophysical parameters and yield, the potential of multivariate models has little been investigated to estimate these parameters under multiple agronomic practices. Therefore, both simple indices and multivariate models (partial least square regression (PLSR) and support vector machines (SVR)) obtained from hyperspectral reflectance data were compared for their applicability for assessing the biophysical parameters in a field experiment involving different combinations of three irrigation rates (1.00, 0.75, and 0.50 ET) and five plant densities (D1: 150, D2: 250, D3: 350, D4: 450, and D5: 550 seeds m-2) in order to improve productivity and water use efficiency of wheat. Results show that the highest values for green leaf area, aboveground biomass, and grain yield were obtained from the combination of D3 or D4 with 1.00 ET, while the combination of 0.75 ET and D3 was the best treatment for achieving the highest values for water use efficiency. Wheat yield response factor (ky) was acceptable when the 0.75 ET was combined with D2, D3, or D4 or when the 0.50 ET was combined with D2 or D3, as the ky values of these combinations were less than or around one. The production function indicated that about 75% grain yield variation could be attributed to the variation in seasonal ET. Results also show that the performance of the SRIs fluctuated when regressions were analyzed for each irrigation rate or plant density specifically, or when the data of all irrigation rates or plant densities were combined. Most of the SRIs failed to assess biophysical parameters under specific irrigation rates and some specific plant densities, but performance improved substantially for combined data of irrigation rates and some specific plant densities. PLSR and SVR produced more accurate estimations of biophysical parameters than SRIs under specific irrigation rates and plant densities. In conclusion, hyperspectral data are useful for predicting and monitoring yield and water productivity of spring wheat across multiple agronomic practices.

Identifiers

PMID30840631
PMCPMC6402754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.