Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840627›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Mysteries in embryonic development: How can errors arise so frequently at the beginning of mammalian life?

Isabell Schneider, Jan Ellenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microplastic-Mediated Delivery of Di-butyl Phthalate AltersMicroplastics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reproductive outcomes predicted by phase imaging with computational specificity of spermatozoon ultrastructure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabell SchneiderCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0640-3949
Jan EllenbergCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-701X
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Organization · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome segregation errors occur frequently during female meiosis but also in the first mitoses of mammalian preimplantation development. Such errors can lead to aneuploidy, spontaneous abortions, and birth defects. Some of the mechanisms underlying these errors in meiosis have been deciphered but which mechanisms could cause chromosome missegregation in the first embryonic cleavage divisions is mostly a "mystery". In this article, we describe the starting conditions and challenges of these preimplantation divisions, which might impair faithful chromosome segregation. We also highlight the pending research to provide detailed insight into the mechanisms and regulation of preimplantation mitoses.

Indexed as

AneuploidyAnimalsBlastocystCell CycleChromosome SegregationEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleMeiosisPregnancyZygote

Identifiers

PMID30840627
PMCPMC6422315
OpenAlexW2918712294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.