Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840520›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

Basolateral amygdala neurons are activated during threat expectation.

Alon Amir, Pinelopi Kyriazi, Seung-Chan Lee, Drew B Headley, Denis Paré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Signaling of salience and prediction errors by anterior insula neurons.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distinct Processing of Aversive Experience in Amygdala Subregions.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alon AmirCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Newark, New Jersey.
Pinelopi KyriaziCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Newark, New Jersey.
Seung-Chan LeeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Newark, New Jersey.
Drew B HeadleyCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Newark, New Jersey.
Denis ParéCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Newark, New Jersey.

Funding

Midline thalamic control of the amygdalaR01MH107239 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Beyond conditioned fear: encoding of stimulus properties and behaviors by amygdala neuronsR01MH112505 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Vertical Microbiome Transmission: Implications for Infant GrowthK01MD020215 · NIMHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLZHAUSEN, ELIZABETH A · 2024 to 2025
$656k
NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD020215NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107239NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear conditioning studies have led to the view that the amygdala contains neurons that signal threat and in turn elicit defensive behaviors through their brain stem and hypothalamic targets. In agreement with this model, a prior unit-recording study in rats performing a seminaturalistic foraging task revealed that many lateral amygdala (LA) neurons are predator responsive. In contrast, our previous study emphasized that most basolateral (BL) amygdala neurons are inhibited at proximity of the predator. However, the two studies used different methods to analyze unit activity, complicating comparisons between them. By applying the same method to the sample of BL neurons we recorded previously, the present study revealed that most principal cells are inhibited by the predator and only 4.5% are activated. Moreover, two-thirds of these cells were also activated by nonthreatening stimuli. In fact, fitting unit activity with a generalized linear model revealed that the only task variables associated with a prevalent positive modulation of BL activity were expectation of the predator's presence and whether the prior trial had been a failure or success. At odds with the threat-coding model of the amygdala, actual confrontation with the predator was usually associated with a widespread inhibition of principal BL neurons.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalFearAction PotentialsAmygdalaAnimalsMaleNeural InhibitionNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyamygdalafearforagingpredatorthreat

Identifiers

PMID30840520
PMCPMC6589710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.