Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840508›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2019

Developing Intra-EVA Science Support Team Practices for a Human Mission to Mars.

S J Payler, Z Mirmalek, S S Hughes, S E Kobs Nawotniak, A L Brady, A H Stevens, C S Cockell, D S S Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S J Payler1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Z Mirmalek2 Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
S S Hughes4 Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA.
S E Kobs Nawotniak4 Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA.
A L Brady5 School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
A H Stevens1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
C S Cockell1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
D S S Lim3 BAER Institute, Moffett Field, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the BASALT research program, real (nonsimulated) geological and biological science was accomplished through a series of extravehicular activities (EVAs) under simulated Mars mission conditions. These EVAs were supported by a Mission Support Center (MSC) that included an on-site, colocated Science Support Team (SST). The SST was composed of scientists from a variety of disciplines and operations researchers who provided scientific and technical expertise to the crew while each EVA was being conducted (intra-EVA). SST management and organization developed under operational conditions that included Mars-like communication latencies, bandwidth constraints, and EVA plans that were infused with Mars analog field science objectives. This paper focuses on the SST workspace considerations such as science team roles, physical layout, communication interactions, operational techniques, and work support technology. Over the course of BASALT field deployments to Idaho and Hawai'i, the SST team made several changes of note to increase both productivity and efficiency. For example, new roles were added for more effective management of technical discussions, and the layout of the SST workspace evolved multiple times during the deployments. SST members' reflexive adjustments resulted in a layout that prioritized face-to-face discussions over face-to-data displays, highlighting the importance of interpersonal communication during SST decision-making. In tandem with these workspace adjustments, a range of operational techniques were developed to help the SST manage discussions and information flow under time pressure.

Indexed as

Extravehicular ActivityMarsAstronautsCommunicationDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesEfficiencyHawaiiHumansIdahoInterpersonal RelationsSatellite CommunicationsSpace SimulationAnalogEVAMarsScience operationsWorkspace

Identifiers

PMID30840508
PMCPMC6442258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.