Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840506›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2019

Requirements for Portable Instrument Suites during Human Scientific Exploration of Mars.

Alexander Sehlke, Zara Mirmalek, David Burtt, Christopher W Haberle, Delia Santiago-Materese, Shannon E Kobs Nawotniak, Scott S Hughes, W Brent Garry, Nathan Bramall, Adrian J Brown and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexander Sehlke1 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California.
Zara Mirmalek2 Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
David Burtt4 Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Christopher W Haberle5 Mars Space Flight Facility, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Delia Santiago-Materese1 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California.
Shannon E Kobs Nawotniak6 Deparment of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho.
Scott S Hughes6 Deparment of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho.
W Brent Garry7 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.
Nathan Bramall8 Leiden Measurement Technology LLC, Sunnyvale, California.
Adrian J Brown9 NASA Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jennifer L Heldmann1 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California.
Darlene S S Lim1 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human explorers on the surface of Mars will have access to a far wider array of scientific tools than previous crewed planetary exploration missions, but not every tool will be compatible with the restrictions of this exploration. Spectrometers on flyby, orbital, and landed missions are currently used to determine the composition and mineralogy of geological materials of various types and sizes, from small fragments to celestial bodies in the solar system. Handheld spectrometers that are capable of in situ analyses are already used for geological exploration on Earth; however, their usefulness for human exploration missions and how data from multiple handheld instruments could be combined to enhance scientific return must be further evaluated. As part of the Biologic Analog Science Associated with Lava Terrains (BASALT) research project, we incorporated two handheld instruments, a visible-near infrared spectrometer and an X-Ray Fluorescence spectrometer, into simulated Mars exploration missions conducted on basaltic terrains in Idaho and Hawai'i. To understand the data quality provided by these handheld spectrometers, we evaluated their performance under varying conditions of measurement time, distance, angle, atmosphere, and sample matrix, and we compared data quality between handheld instruments and laboratory techniques. Here, we summarize these findings, provide guidelines and requirements on how to effectively incorporate these instruments into human exploration missions to Mars, and posit that future iterations of these instruments will be beneficial for enhancing science returned from human exploration missions.

Indexed as

MarsAtmosphereExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentGuidelines as TopicHumansSilicatesSpace FlightSpectrum AnalysisbasaltSilicatesBasaltExplorationExtra-vehicular activitiesHandheld spectrometersMarsOperations

Identifiers

PMID30840506
PMCPMC6442242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.