Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840503›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2019

Tactical Scientific Decision-Making during Crewed Astrobiology Mars Missions.

A H Stevens, S E Kobs Nawotniak, W B Garry, S J Payler, A L Brady, M J Miller, K H Beaton, C S Cockell, D S S Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A H Stevens1 UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
S E Kobs Nawotniak2 Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA.
W B Garry3 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
S J Payler1 UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
A L Brady4 School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
M J Miller5 Georgia Institute of Technology College of Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
K H Beaton6 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
C S Cockell1 UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
D S S Lim7 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limitations placed upon human explorers on the surface of Mars will necessitate a methodology for scientific exploration that is different from standard approaches to terrestrial fieldwork and prior crewed exploration of the Moon. In particular, the data transmission limitations and communication latency between Earth and Mars create a unique situation for surface crew in contact with a terrestrial science team. The BASALT research program simulated a series of extravehicular activities (EVAs) in Mars analog terrains under various Mars-relevant bandwidth and latency conditions to investigate how best to approach this problem. Here we discuss tactical decision-making under these conditions, that is, how the crew on Mars interacts with a team of scientists and support personnel on Earth to collect samples of maximum scientific interest. We describe the strategies, protocols, and tools tested in BASALT EVAs and give recommendations on how best to conduct human exploration of Mars with support from Earth-based scientists. We find that even with scientists supporting them, the crew performing the exploration must be trained in the appropriate scientific disciplines in order to provide the terrestrial scientists with enough information to make decisions, but that with appropriate planning and structure, and tools such as a "dynamic leaderboard," terrestrial scientists can add scientific value to an EVA, even under Mars communication latency.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingMarsSatellite CommunicationsAstronautsEarth, PlanetExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentHumansSpacecraftTime FactorsDecision-makingEVAMarsScience operationsTactical

Identifiers

PMID30840503
PMCPMC6442282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.