ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2019
Investigating the minimum distance between the finger flexor tendons and distal radius during wrist and finger positions in healthy people.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasonographic evaluation of contact configuration between flexor pollicis longus tendon and the volar prominence of volar plate in patients with distal radius fracture.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRupture of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and index flexor digitorum profundus (FDP2) tendons often occurs after locking plate fixation for distal radius fracture. This study aimed to determine the shortest tendon-radius distances of different hand positions.
methodsFifty-nine hands of 30 healthy volunteers were studied. Distances between the FPL or FDP2 and distal radius were calculated in six wrist positions: 30° palmar flexion, neutral, 30° dorsiflexion, 60° dorsiflexion, maximum dorsiflexion, and 40° ulnar deviation with three finger positions (full extension and flexion of fingers, full flexion of the thumb or index finger, and full extension of the other four fingers). The shortest distance between the FPL or FDP2 and distal radius was noted.
resultsThe shortest distance between the FPL and distal radius was during maximum wrist dorsiflexion with isolated thumb flexion. The distance between the FDP2 and distal radius was shortest with all-finger flexion in 30° wrist dorsiflexion.
conclusionsIt is necessary to measure the distance between the FPL and distal radius in maximal wrist dorsiflexion with full flexion of the isolated thumb, as the shortest distance was observed with flexion of the isolated thumb. On the contrary, we recommend measuring the distance between the FDP2 and distal radius in 30° wrist dorsiflexion with flexion of all fingers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.