Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840201›Full record

ReviewInfection2019

AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: what a clinician should know.

Simone Meini, Carlo Tascini, Marco Cei, Emanuela Sozio, Gian Maria Rossolini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline for antimicrobial treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: practice recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Species identification and genotyping ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Interaction of the SXT/R391 element ICEMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  19. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simone MeiniInternal Medicine Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy. simonemeini2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-8305
Carlo TasciniFirst Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Marco CeiInternal Medicine Unit, Cecina Hospital, Cecina, Italy.
Emanuela SozioEmergency Department, North-West District Tuscany Health Care, Spedali Riuniti, Leghorn, Italy.
Gian Maria RossoliniClinical Microbiology and Virology Unit, Florence Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale D. Cotugno · ITOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnterobacterales are among the most common causes of bacterial infections in the community and among hospitalized patients, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains have emerged as a major threat to human health. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is typical of MDRs, being mainly due to the production of extended spectrum β-lactamases or AmpC-type β-lactamases.

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to review the epidemiological impact, diagnostic issues and treatment options with AmpC producers.

findingsAmpC enzymes encoded by resident chromosomal genes (cAmpCs) are produced by some species (e.g., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens), while plasmid-encoded AmpCs (pAmpCs) can be encountered also in species that normally do not produce cAmpCs (e.g., Salmonella enterica, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca) or produce them at negligible levels (e.g., Escherichia coli). Production of AmpCs can be either inducible or constitutive, resulting in different resistance phenotypes. Strains producing cAmpCs in an inducible manner (e.g., Enterobacter spp.) usually appear susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins, which are poor inducers, but can easily yield mutants constitutively producing the enzyme which are resistant to these drugs (which are good substrates), resulting in treatment failures. pAmpCs are usually constitutively expressed. Production of pAmpCs is common in community-acquired infections, while cAmpC producers are mainly involved in healthcare-associated infections.

conclusionsTo date, there is no conclusive evidence about the most appropriate treatment for AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Carbapenems are often the preferred option, especially for severe infections in which adequate source control is not achieved, but cefepime is also supported by substantial clinical evidences as an effective carbapenem-sparing option.

Indexed as

Enterobacteriaceae InfectionsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeHumansPrevalenceAmpC beta-lactamasesBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesAmpCAntibiotic resistanceBeta-lactamasesEnterobacterEnterobacteralesGram negative

Identifiers

PMID30840201
OpenAlexW2920733498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.