ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019
Absolute count of leukemic blasts in cerebrospinal fluid as detected by flow cytometry is a relevant prognostic factor in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological features of blast identification in the cerebrospinal fluid: A systematic review of flow cytometry and laboratory haematology methods.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2022Pooled it
- Low flow cytometry events in detecting CNS involvement in pediatric B-cell precursor ALL: NGS validation and prognostic significance.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry in Chinese children with B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- One-point flow cytometric MRD measurement to identify children with excellent outcome after intermediate-risk BCP-ALL: results of the ALL-MB 2008 study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Showing Unilateral Motor Dysfunction Prior to Chemotherapy: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Flow Cytometric Detection of Malignant Blasts in Cerebrospinal Fluid: A Biomarker of Central Nervous System Involvement in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid to Guide Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Heterogeneity of childhood acute leukemia with mature B-cell immunophenotype.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019Article
- Importance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Cytometry in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Case reports in oncologyArticle
- Diagnostic Value and Prognosis Significance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Examination by Flow Cytometry in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Technology in cancer research & treatmentObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUsually, central nervous system (CNS) involvement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is diagnosed by cytomorphology (CM) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on cytospin slides. Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) provides the opportunity to detect low numbers of leukemia cells undetectable by CM. The present study aimed at evaluating the clinical significance of MFC for the diagnosis of CNS involvement at initial manifestation of childhood ALL.
methodsIn 155 children with ALL, CSF samples were studied in parallel by CM and MFC. Patients were treated according to protocol ALL-MB-2008 for childhood ALL. The prognostic impact of the leukemia burden in CSF was determined categorizing the findings as positive/negative. In addition, the absolute blast cell count per 1 ml of CSF was studied as a continuous variable.
resultsCSF positivity was significantly more frequent using MFC compared with CM (35.3% vs. 15.3% of patients). The outcome of MFC-positive and MFC-negative patients was not different in clinically relevant patient risk groups-CNS1, standard and intermediate-risk groups. Using the quantitative approach, at the threshold level of 20 blasts per ml of CSF, patients could be divided into two groups with a significantly different outcome, irrespective of the clinical risk group, the type of CNS-directed therapy, and the CNS status determined by CM.
conclusionsOur data do not support the concept of re-stratification and modification of therapy based on qualitative CSF investigation by MFC. However, MFC is a highly sensitive technique of CSF investigation improving the definition of CNS involvement in childhood ALL, and quantitative measurement of blast cells in CSF, if well-organized, can be a useful additional tool for stratification of patients in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.