Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840174›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2019

Ventral hernia repair outcomes predicted by a 5-item modified frailty index using NSQIP variables.

F M Balla, C G Yheulon, J L Stetler, A D Patel, E Lin, S S Davis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F M BallaDivision of General and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, 4th Floor Building A, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. drfadiballa@gmail.com.
C G YheulonDivision of General and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, 4th Floor Building A, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
J L StetlerDivision of General and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, 4th Floor Building A, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
A D PatelDivision of General and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, 4th Floor Building A, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
E LinDivision of General and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, 4th Floor Building A, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
S S DavisDivision of General and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, 4th Floor Building A, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFrailty is a decrease in physiologic reserve that is separate from the normal aging process. Previously, an 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) using NSQIP variables predicted outcomes for surgical patients. We aim to validate a condensed 5-item mFI in ventral hernia patients and determine outcomes and the relative impact of each frailty variable.

methodsThe NSQIP database was queried from 2011 to 2016 for patients undergoing VHR. Spearman's rho correlation was used to determine the degree of correlation between 11-item and 5-item mFI raw frailty scores. Chi squared testing was used to determine odds ratios (95% CI) for accumulating frailty variables in both indices with regard to complications vs a baseline of zero variables present on the 11-item scale. Complications were defined by the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on each frailty variable to determine their relative weighted impacts on outcomes.

results97,905 patients (99.45%) had all five frailty variables recorded. Only 11,549 patients (11.73%) had all variables from the 11-item mFI. No difference existed between groups for the five mutually shared frailty variables, BMI, emergent vs non-emergent procedures, operative time, or operative approach. For accumulating variables in both indices, the 5-item mFI predicts incidence of any complications, major complications, and discharge not to home similarly to the 11-item mFI. The most significantly weighted variable for complications and discharge not to home is functional status.

conclusionA 5-item mFI accurately predicts outcomes similar to the validated 11-item mFI and captures more patients for analysis.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFrailtyFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexUnited StatesFrailtyModified frailty indexNSQIPOutcomesVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.