Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840159›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Intensive multidisciplinary management in critical care patients affected by severe necrotizing soft tissue infections: a cooperative method to improve the efficacy of treatment.

Milo Gatti, Laura Elisa Gasparini, Matteo Laratta, Anna Sigurtà, Anna Rossi, Paolo Brioschi, Osvaldo Chiara, Chiara Vismara, Francesco Scaglione, Sergio Arlati

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Milo GattiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Laura Elisa GaspariniIntensive Care Unit 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy.
Matteo LarattaIntensive Care Unit 3, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Anna SigurtàIntensive Care Unit 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy.
Anna RossiIntensive Care Unit 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy.
Paolo BrioschiIntensive Care Unit 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy.
Osvaldo ChiaraDepartment of General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Chiara VismaraDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Francesco ScaglioneDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sergio ArlatiIntensive Care Unit 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy. sergioarlati58@gmail.com.
Ospedale Maggiore · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To illustrate the effectiveness of our intensive multidisciplinary management (IMM) in the treatment of severely ill patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). A retrospective observational study was conducted in a general ICU. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing IMM were carefully compared with 30 consecutive patients receiving a standard management (SM). IMM combined intensive care management, early surgical debridement followed by daily inspection of surgical wounds, close microbiological surveillance, and targeted high-dose antibiotics. IMM was associated with the better decrease of daily SOFA score (p = 0.04). Also, IMM caused + 12% increase in the overall number of surgical procedures (p = 0.022) and a higher number of tissue biopsies/per day (median 0.63 versus 0.32; p = 0.025), leading to a more targeted antimicrobial changes (89.6% vs 51.6%; p < 0.00001). High-dose daptomycin (75% vs 36.7%; p = 0.002) and extended/continuous infusion of beta-lactams (75% vs 43.3%; p = 0.011) were more frequently utilized. A specific efficiency score correlated with the decrease of SOFA score (efficacy) in IMM patients only (p = 0.027). Finally, IMM was associated with a significant lower ICU mortality rate (15.6% vs 40%; p = 0.032). IMM was more effective than SM as it allowed the earlier control of infection and the faster reduction of multiple organ-dysfunction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsCritical CareDebridementFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisOrgan Dysfunction ScoresProgram EvaluationRetrospective StudiesSoft Tissue InfectionsAnti-Infective AgentsAntibiotic de-escalationIntensive care unitIntensive multidisciplinary managementSevere necrotizing soft tissue infectionsTargeted antimicrobial therapy

Identifiers

PMID30840159
OpenAlexW2921546144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.