Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840107›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2019

[Lupus nephritis].

J Schreiber, U Eisenberger, K de Groot

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J SchreiberMedizinische Klinik III (Nephrologie, Hypertensiologie, Rheumatologie), Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, KfH-Nierenzentrum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66-70, 63069, Offenbach, Deutschland.
U EisenbergerKlinik für Nephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
K de GrootMedizinische Klinik III (Nephrologie, Hypertensiologie, Rheumatologie), Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, KfH-Nierenzentrum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66-70, 63069, Offenbach, Deutschland. kirsten@de-groot.de.
Sana Klinikum Offenbach · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent and one of the most severe organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. The central pathogenetic mechanism is characterized by the loss of immune tolerance against autoantigens of the cell nucleus, which can lead to renal inflammation via the formation of nuclear autoantibodies. The clinical manifestations of LN encompass nephritic syndrome with the special form of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, nephrotic syndrome and thrombotic microangiopathy. The diagnostic procedures consist of renal function and urine analysis as well as the determination of serum autoantibody profiles and complement components. An early renal biopsy enables a differentiation between the prognostically different forms of LN. In addition to supportive measures, a differentiated immunosuppressive treatment is the main approach for prognostically unfavorable forms. Important components are corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil for induction treatment. Currently investigated treatment principles include next generation calcineurin inhibitors and anti-B cell treatment.

Indexed as

CyclophosphamideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisThrombotic MicroangiopathiesCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsComplement system proteinsGlomerulonephritisImmunosuppressionLupus erythematosus, systemicNephrotic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID30840107
OpenAlexW4247066011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.