Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30840085›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2019

Feasibility of a Hybrid Web-Based and In-Person Self-management Intervention Aimed at Preventing Acute to Chronic Pain Transition After Major Lower Extremity Trauma (iPACT-E-Trauma): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

M Bérubé, C Gélinas, N Feeley, G Martorella, J Côté, G Y Laflamme, D M Rouleau, M Choinière

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Strategies to prevent long-term opioid use following trauma: a Canadian practice survey.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M BérubéFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
C GélinasFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
N FeeleyIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
G MartorellaCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
J CôtéCentre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
G Y LaflammeHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Centre Intégré Universitaire du Nord de l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
D M RouleauHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Centre Intégré Universitaire du Nord de l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
M ChoinièreCentre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MFE-140934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective 1) To assess the feasibility of research methods to test a self-management intervention aimed at preventing acute to chronic pain transition in patients with major lower extremity trauma (iPACT-E-Trauma) and 2) to evaluate its potential effects at three and six months postinjury. Design A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups. Setting A supraregional level 1 trauma center. Methods Fifty-six adult patients were randomized. Participants received the intervention or an educational pamphlet. Several parameters were evaluated to determine the feasibility of the research methods. The potential efficacy of iPACT-E-Trauma was evaluated with measures of pain intensity and pain interference with activities. Results More than 80% of eligible patients agreed to participate, and an attrition rate of ≤18% was found. Less than 40% of screened patients were eligible, and obtaining baseline data took 48 hours postadmission on average. Mean scores of mild pain intensity and pain interference with daily activities (<4/10) on average were obtained in both groups at three and six months postinjury. Between 20% and 30% of participants reported moderate to high mean scores (≥4/10) on these outcomes at the two follow-up time measures. The experimental group perceived greater considerable improvement in pain (60% in the experimental group vs 46% in the control group) at three months postinjury. Low mean scores of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale score < 30) and anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores ≤ 10) were obtained through the end of the study. Conclusions Some challenges that need to be addressed in a future RCT include the small proportion of screened patients who were eligible and the selection of appropriate tools to measure the development of chronic pain. Studies will need to be conducted with patients presenting more serious injuries and psychological vulnerability or using a stepped screening approach.

Indexed as

InternetAdultAgedAnxietyCatastrophizationChronic PainDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient Education as TopicAcute PainChronic PainFeasibility StudiesHealth PromotionInternetLower ExtremityPilot ProjectsSelf-CareWound and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID30840085
PMCPMC6784743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.