ArticleThe Analyst2019
A comparison of mid-infrared spectral regions on accuracy of tissue classification.
Article in The Analyst, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- IR Spectroscopy and Linear Support Vector Machine Analysis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Linear Support Vector Machine Model of an IR Spectral Library: Application to Skin Cancer.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Digital Histopathology by Infrared Spectroscopic Imaging.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2023Review
- Classification of the Residues after High and Low Order Explosions Using Machine Learning Techniques on Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectra.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hair Histology and Glycosaminoglycans Distribution Probed by Infrared Spectral Imaging: Focus on Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan and Glypican-1 during Hair Growth Cycle.Biomolecules · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infrared (IR) spectroscopic imaging, utilizing both the molecular and structural disease signatures, enables extensive profiling of tumors and their microenvironments. Here, we examine the relative merits of using either the fingerprint or the high frequency regions of the IR spectrum for tissue histopathology. We selected a complex model as a test case, evaluating both stromal and epithelial segmentation for various breast pathologies. IR spectral classification in each of these spectral windows is quantitatively assessed by estimating area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for pixel level accuracy and images for diagnostic ability. We found only small differences, though some that may be sufficiently important in diagnostic tasks to be clinically significant, between the two regions with the fingerprint region-based classifiers consistently emerging as more accurate. The work provides added evidence and comparison with fingerprint region, complex models, and previously untested tissue type (breast) - that the use of restricted spectral regions can provide high accuracy. Our study indicates that the fingerprint region is ideal for epithelial and stromal models to obtain high pixel level accuracies. Glass slides provide a limited spectral feature set but provides accurate information at the patient level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.