Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30839779›Full record

ReviewApplied network science2018

Connectivity and complex systems: learning from a multi-disciplinary perspective.

Laura Turnbull, Marc-Thorsten Hütt, Andreas A Ioannides, Stuart Kininmonth, Ronald Poeppl, Klement Tockner, Louise J Bracken, Saskia Keesstra, Lichan Liu, Rens Masselink and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied network science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura Turnbull1Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3307-1214
Marc-Thorsten Hütt2Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Andreas A IoannidesLaboratory for Human Brain Dynamics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Stuart KininmonthStockholm Resilience Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ronald Poeppl6University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Klement Tockner7Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Louise J Bracken1Durham University, Durham, UK.
Saskia KeesstraWageningenUR, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Lichan LiuLaboratory for Human Brain Dynamics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Rens MasselinkWageningenUR, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Anthony J Parsons11University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, parallel developments in disparate disciplines have focused on what has come to be termed

Indexed as

Connectivity StudiesEmergent BehaviourFunctional ConnectivityFundamental UnitMeasuring ConnectivityStructural Connectivity

Identifiers

PMID30839779
PMCPMC6214298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.