ArticleRoyal Society open science2018
Assessment of air quality using a cloud model method.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Air quality assessment in Beijing based on cloud model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Safety Assessment of Casting Workshop by Cloud Model and Cause and Effect-LOPA to Protect Employee Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Comprehensive evaluation system for stability of multiple dams in a uranium tailings reservoir: based on the TOPSIS model and bow tie model.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Optimization of sand casting performance parameters and missing data prediction.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Thermal decomposition characteristics of foundry sand for cast iron in nitrogen atmosphere.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Sand casting safety assessment for foundry enterprises: fault tree analysis, Heinrich accident triangle, HAZOP-LOPA, bow tie model.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To effectively control air pollution, it is necessary to obtain a preliminary assessment of air quality. The purpose of this study was to introduce a cloud model method in air pollution assessment. First, the standard cloud models of air pollution indicators were obtained, and the calculating process of numerical characteristics employed by the standard cloud model was explained. Second, the levels of air pollution indicators were presented based on the qualitative and quantitative analysis of cloud models, which realized the uncertainty conversion between qualitative concepts and their corresponding quantitative values, as well as taking the fuzziness and randomness into account. Air quality assessment results including SO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.