ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
Using Paid and Free Facebook Methods to Recruit Australian Parents to an Online Survey: An Evaluation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter for recruiting healthy participants in nutrition-, physical activity-, or obesity-related studies: a systematic review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Recruitment into antibody prevalence studies: a randomized trial of postcards vs. letters as invitations.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Trial
- Understanding Recruitment Yield From Social Media Advertisements and Associated Costs of a Telehealth Randomized Controlled Trial: Descriptive Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Successful and Cost-Effective Facebook Recruitment: Is It Possible? Results From a Longitudinal Randomized Clinical Trial in Grandmother Caregivers.International journal of aging & human development · 2021Trial
- Online sexual health survey implementation: Practical lessons from a comparative, mixed-methods analysis of 30 countries.PloS one · 2026Article
- Parental Mental Health and Child Maltreatment in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Importance of Sampling in a Quantitative Statistical Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Assessing self-selection biases in Facebook-recruited online surveys: Evidence from the COVID-19 Health Behavior Survey.PloS one · 2025Article
- Intimate Partner Violence Risk Factors: A Vulnerability-Adaptation Stress Model Approach.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2024Article
- Community engagement through social media: A promising low-cost strategy for rural recruitment?The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024Article
- Autism Traits and Cognitive Performance: Mediating Roles of Sleep Disturbance, Anxiety and Depression.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023Article
- A scoping review of health promotion interventions delivered via social media to women of reproductive age.Public health nutrition · 2023Article
- Family Bonds with Pets and Mental Health during COVID-19 in Australia: A Complex Picture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- How the mental health of working parents in Australia changed during COVID-19: A pre- to during pandemic longitudinal comparison.Journal of affective disorders · 2023Article
- How to Avoid Lower Priority for Smoking Cessation Support Content on Facebook: An Analysis of Engagement Bait.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Recruiting Fathers for Parenting Research: An Evaluation of Eight Recruitment Methods and an Exploration of Fathers' Motivations for Participation.Parenting, science and practice · 2023Article
- Social Media Recruitment Strategies to Recruit Pregnant Women Into a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study: Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Observational
- The use of online social media for the recruitment of people living with HIV in Spain and Latin America: Lessons from two studies.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Social Media Use for Research Participant Recruitment: Integrative Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Review
- Welcoming, supportive care in US birthing facilities and realization of breastfeeding goals.Midwifery · 2022Article
- Children, Work, and Safety on the Farm during COVID-19: A Harder Juggling Act.Journal of agromedicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of social media makes it a potential alternative to traditional offline methods of recruiting and engaging participants in health research. Despite burgeoning use and interest, few studies have rigorously evaluated its effectiveness and feasibility in terms of recruitment rates and costs, sample representativeness, and retention.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of using Facebook to recruit employed Australian parents to an online survey about managing work and family demands, specifically to examine (1) recruitment rates and costs; (2) sample representativeness, compared with a population-based cohort of parents; and (3) retention, including demographic and health characteristics of parents who returned to complete a follow-up survey 6 weeks later.
methodsRecruitment was conducted using 20 paid Facebook advertising campaigns, supplemented with free advertising approaches such as posts on relevant Facebook pages and requests for professional networks to circulate the survey link via Facebook. Recruitment rates and costs were evaluated using the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys, including view rate, participation rate, completion rate, cost per consent, and cost per completer. Sample representativeness was evaluated by comparing demographic and outcome variables with a comparable sample from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children including educational attainment, marital status, country of birth, neighborhood disadvantage, work-family conflict, and psychological distress. Retention was evaluated by comparing the number and demographic characteristics of participants at recruitment and at 6-week follow-up.
resultsRecruitment strategies together resulted in 6653 clicks on the survey link, from which 5378 parents consented to participate and 4665 (86.74%) completed the survey. Of those who completed the survey, 85.94% (4009/4665) agreed to be recontacted, with 57.79% (2317/4009) completing the follow-up survey (ie, 43.08% [2317/5378] of parents who consented to the initial survey). Paid Facebook advertising recruited nearly 75% of the sample at Aus $2.32 per completed survey (Aus $7969 spent, 3440 surveys completed). Compared with a population-based sample, participants at baseline were more likely to be university educated (P<.001), experience greater work-family conflict (P<.001) and psychological distress (P<.001), and were less likely to be born outside Australia (P<.001) or live in a disadvantaged neighborhood (P<.001).
conclusionsFacebook provided a feasible, rapid method to recruit a large national sample of parents for health research. However, some sample biases were observed and should be considered when recruiting participants via Facebook. Retention of participants at 6- to 8-week follow-up was less than half the initial sample; this may reflect limited ongoing participant engagement for those recruited through social media, compared with face-to-face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.