Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30839153›Full record

ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2019

Pharmacokinetics of ferric bepectate-a new intravenous iron drug for treating iron deficiency.

Manuel Muñoz, Peter Skov Olsen, Tonny Studsgaard Petersen, Susanne Manhart, Stig Waldorff

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manuel MuñozPerioperative Transfusion Medicine, Department of Surgical Specialties, Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Peter Skov OlsenCardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tonny Studsgaard PetersenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne ManhartSerumwerk Bernburg AG, Bernburg, Germany.
Stig WaldorffIron4u, Holte, Denmark.

Funding

Iron4u
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IV iron is indicated in clinical conditions, where rapid anaemia alleviation and repletion of iron stores are required. The acute toxicity of IV iron is ascribed to the presence of labile iron in plasma. Thus, shorter plasma residence time might improve the safety profile, even for compounds holding-on the iron tightly. In this single-centre, open-label, single-dose escalation study, we evaluated the elimination kinetics of ferric bepectate (FBP) compared to those of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). Thirty-three iron-depleted anaemic patients who had undergone cardiac surgery were included and received 200, 500 or 1500 mg FBP or 500 mg FCM. Plasma drug curves were subjected to model-free analysis. Because saturation kinetics was found, a compartmental model with limited elimination capacity was applied. Urinary iron excretion was also analysed. The initial non-compartmental analysis revealed an increasing AUC/dose ratio for FBP. For both drugs, the central distribution compartment corresponded to plasma volume, and elimination followed Michaelis-Menten saturation kinetics. Maximal elimination rates (V

Indexed as

AgedAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDose-Response Relationship, DrugFerric CompoundsHumansInfusions, IntravenousIronMaleMaltoseMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRenal Eliminationferric carboxymaltoseFerric CompoundsIronMaltoseintravenous iron drugslabile ironmichaelis-menten kineticsside effectsurinary iron

Identifiers

PMID30839153
PMCPMC6849879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.