ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2019
Yeast two- and three-species hybrids and high-sugar fermentation.
Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of the Champagne-Epernay-Geisenheim (CEG) Wine Yeast via Meiotic Spore Clone Selection.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Understanding brewing trait inheritance inmSystems · 2024Article
- Synthetic two-species allodiploid and three-species allotetraploid Saccharomyces hybrids with euploid (complete) parental subgenomes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Patterns of Genomic Instability in Interspecific Yeast Hybrids With Diverse Ancestries.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021Article
- MAT heterozygosity and the second sterility barrier in the reproductive isolation of Saccharomyces species.Current genetics · 2020Article
- Never Change a Brewing Yeast? Why Not, There Are Plenty to Choose From.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Diversity and Postzygotic Evolution of the Mitochondrial Genome in Hybrids ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Yeast two- and three-species hybrids and high-sugar fermentation.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Review
- Overexpression ofMicroorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dominating strains of most sugar-based natural and industrial fermentations either belong to Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum or are their chimeric derivatives. Osmotolerance is an essential trait of these strains for industrial applications in which typically high concentrations of sugars are used. As the ability of the cells to cope with the hyperosmotic stress is under polygenic control, significant improvement can be expected from concerted modification of the activity of multiple genes or from creating new genomes harbouring positive alleles of strains of two or more species. In this review, the application of the methods of intergeneric and interspecies hybridization to fitness improvement of strains used under high-sugar fermentation conditions is discussed. By protoplast fusion and heterospecific mating, hybrids can be obtained that outperform the parental strains in certain technological parameters including osmotolerance. Spontaneous postzygotic genome evolution during mitotic propagation (GARMi) and meiosis after the breakdown of the sterility barrier by loss of MAT heterozygosity (GARMe) can be exploited for further improvement. Both processes result in derivatives of chimeric genomes, some of which can be superior both to the parental strains and to the hybrid. Three-species hybridization represents further perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.