ArticleInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2019
Evaluation of Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium training recommendations on modified Rodnan skin score assessment in scleroderma.
Article in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Am I doing this right?' Physician perceptions of the global assessment in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Preliminary nomogram model for predicting irreversible organ damage of patients with systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis and Morphea.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024Review
- Skin involvement in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an unmet clinical need.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- Heart disease in the course of systemic sclerosis - an observational study.Reumatologia · 2022Article
- Evaluation of limited hand mobility in systemic sclerosis patients by using "prayer sign" and "tabletop sign".Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium training recommendations on modified Rodnan skin score assessment in scleroderma.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a validated outcome measure for skin thickness in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Training has been shown to reduce variability in the measurement of mRSS. Our objective was to assess the inter- and intra-observer variability of mRSS scoring using the proposed recommendations for training by the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) and World Scleroderma Foundation (WSF).
methodFifty-two trainees and eight adult SSc patients participated in the SSc skin scoring workshop that was conducted in two sessions by four teachers. Each session, attended by 26 trainees, had a teaching and evaluation phase. The teaching phase comprised of: (a) lecture on mRSS scoring; (b) video demonstration of mRSS scoring; and (c) live demonstration of mRSS on one SSc patient. In the evaluation phase, each trainee independently assessed the mRSS in four SSc patients. For intra-observer reliability, 14 trainees re-assessed the mRSS of two SSc patients whom they had previously examined. We computed the inter- and intra-observer variability using a linear mixed model.
resultsFor the evaluation phase, 34 (65.4%) trainees were within five units of the established teachers' score in 3 out of 4 patients. Overall, the whole group had acceptable inter-observer variability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.71, mean = 8.64 and within-patient standard deviation [SD] = 4.25). The intra-observer ICC was 0.85 and within-patient SD was 2.73.
conclusionThere was good inter-observer and excellent intra-observer reliability. This is the first study examining the training of assessors using the SCTC/WSF recommendations and our results support the importance of standardized training for skin scoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.