Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30838791›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2019

Evaluation of Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium training recommendations on modified Rodnan skin score assessment in scleroderma.

Andrea H L Low, Sue-Ann Ng, Veronica Berrocal, Benjamin Brennan, Grace Chan, Swee-Cheng Ng, Dinesh Khanna

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent Advances in Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis and Morphea.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea H L LowDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sue-Ann NgDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-5725
Veronica BerrocalDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Benjamin BrennanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Grace ChanDepartment of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Swee-Cheng NgDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Dinesh KhannaScleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
National University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Michigan · USTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

Outcomes Research in Rheumatic DiseasesK24AR063120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KHANNA, DINESH · 2012 to 2022
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR063120NIH/NIAMS NIH/ NIAMS K24 AR06312NMRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a validated outcome measure for skin thickness in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Training has been shown to reduce variability in the measurement of mRSS. Our objective was to assess the inter- and intra-observer variability of mRSS scoring using the proposed recommendations for training by the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) and World Scleroderma Foundation (WSF).

methodFifty-two trainees and eight adult SSc patients participated in the SSc skin scoring workshop that was conducted in two sessions by four teachers. Each session, attended by 26 trainees, had a teaching and evaluation phase. The teaching phase comprised of: (a) lecture on mRSS scoring; (b) video demonstration of mRSS scoring; and (c) live demonstration of mRSS on one SSc patient. In the evaluation phase, each trainee independently assessed the mRSS in four SSc patients. For intra-observer reliability, 14 trainees re-assessed the mRSS of two SSc patients whom they had previously examined. We computed the inter- and intra-observer variability using a linear mixed model.

resultsFor the evaluation phase, 34 (65.4%) trainees were within five units of the established teachers' score in 3 out of 4 patients. Overall, the whole group had acceptable inter-observer variability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.71, mean = 8.64 and within-patient standard deviation [SD] = 4.25). The intra-observer ICC was 0.85 and within-patient SD was 2.73.

conclusionThere was good inter-observer and excellent intra-observer reliability. This is the first study examining the training of assessors using the SCTC/WSF recommendations and our results support the importance of standardized training for skin scoring.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesFeasibility StudiesHumansObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsScleroderma, SystemicSeverity of Illness IndexSkinmodified Rodnan skin scorestandardizationsystemic sclerosistraining

Identifiers

PMID30838791
PMCPMC6599552
OpenAlexW2921480072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.