ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2019
Assessing the Return on Investment of Injury Prevention Procedures in Professional Football.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Relationship between Cognitive Demands and Biomechanical Indicators Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Pooled it
- Non-contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Epidemiology in Team-Ball Sports: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis by Sex, Age, Sport, Participation Level, and Exposure Type.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Low-volume Nordic hamstring training improves change-of-direction performance more than higher volumes in youth soccer players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- A sixteen-year epidemiological study of match injuries sustained during the women's Rugby World Cup (2010 to 2025).Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- The player salary costs of match-loss injury and illness at an Australian Football League Club: A six-season retrospective cohort study.JSAMS plus · 2025Article
- Cognitive Control After ACL Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Study on Impaired Proactive Inhibition Compared to Healthy Controls.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Monetising misfortune: the financial consequences of injuries in professional football teams.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of High and Low Training Volume with the Nordic Hamstring Exercise on Hamstring Strength, Jump Height, and Sprint Performance in Female Football Players: A Randomised Trial.Translational sports medicine · 2022Article
- Reducing Injuries in Soccer (Football): an Umbrella Review of Best Evidence Across the Epidemiological Framework for Prevention.Sports medicine - open · 2020Review
- Sports Injury Prevention is Complex: We Need to Invest in Better Processes, Not Singular Solutions.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Review
- RugbySmart: Challenges and Lessons from the Implementation of a Nationwide Sports Injury Prevention Partnership Programme.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Rugby World Cup 2019 injury surveillance study.South African journal of sports medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to develop a quick and simple screening procedure for evaluating the return on investment provided by injury prevention programmes in professional football. Injury prevention in sport has usually been considered in isolation of other management responsibilities, and interventions are published irrespective of whether their impact is worthwhile and irrespective of the return on players' time investment in the programme. This approach is naive from a business perspective and is not an approach normally adopted by commercial organisations.
methodsIn professional football, the overwhelming cost associated with implementing an injury prevention programme is the players' time commitment, and the major benefit is the players' increased availability, achieved through the reduction in the number of injuries. A comparison of these time-based costs and benefits provides the basis for the evaluation process presented.
resultsApplying the evaluation process to a number of published injury prevention programmes recommended for football demonstrates that they are unlikely to provide an adequate return on investment.
conclusionsResearchers should focus on developing injury prevention programmes that provide an adequate return on players' time investment, otherwise there is no incentive for clubs to implement the programmes. Reporting that an injury prevention programme produces a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of injury, for example, is insufficient information. Injury prevention programmes should focus on 'at risk' players to increase the return on investment, and researchers should evaluate and report on the utility of prevention programmes within the intended sports setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30838519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.