Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30838490›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Effects of soil acid stress on the survival, growth, reproduction, antioxidant enzyme activities, and protein contents in earthworm (Eisenia fetida).

Jialong Wu, Zongling Ren, Chi Zhang, Mikael Motelica-Heino, Ting Deng, Haoyu Wang, Jun Dai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mature-StageInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jialong WuCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Zongling RenCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, China. zren@scau.edu.cn.
Chi ZhangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Mikael Motelica-HeinoUniversité d'Orléans, CNRS/INSU Institut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orléans, UMR 6113, Campus Géosciences, 1A rue de la Férollerie, 41071, Orléans, France.
Ting DengCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Haoyu WangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jun DaiCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, China. jundai@scau.edu.cn.
South China Agricultural University · CNUniversité d'Orléans · FR

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFD0201301National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFD0800300Natural Science Foundation of China 41601227Natural Science Foundation of China 41701262Natural Science Foundation of China U1401234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on the study of earthworm survival, growth, reproduction, enzyme activities, and protein contents to evaluate and predict the effects of different soil pH levels and determine the optimal risk assessment indicators for the effects. Survival rate, growth rate, and cocoon number as well as four enzyme (glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT)) activities and two proteins (total protein (TP) and metallothionein (MT)) contents in earthworms were determined to characterize the responses of earthworm activity to five soil pH levels. These biological datasets (survival, growth, and reproduction) were compared with biochemical indexes (GSH-PX, SOD, POD, CAT, TP, and MT), mainly using biphasic dose-response models. The results indicated that the soil pH value had significant inhibitory effects on the survival, growth, and reproduction of earthworms beginning with 3.0, 4.0, and 5.2, respectively. The dose-response models (J-shaped and inverted U-shaped curves) statistics indicated that the critical values (EC

Indexed as

OligochaetaAnimalsAntioxidantsCatalaseSoilSoil PollutantsSuperoxide DismutaseAntioxidantsCatalaseSoilSoil PollutantsSuperoxide DismutaseBiochemical responseEisenia fetidaGrowthHormetic effectReproductionSoil acidity

Identifiers

PMID30838490
OpenAlexW2921757833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.