ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2019
Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cognitive tasks as measures of pig welfare: a systematic review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Pooled it
- Early-Life Behavioral Time Budgets of a Local Dairy Sheep Breed in Indoor and Pasture Systems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Changing the fate of rangelands through behavioral nudges for sustainable land use and management using an extended theory of planned behavior.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Incorporating farm animal models for the study of neuropsychiatric diseases: Expansion of the possibilities.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Moving hens into cages affects cognitive performance, extinction learning and motivation for rewards.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Article
- Cognitive performance and variability in dromedary camels: insights from a comparative psychometric approach.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Cognition of dairy cattle: Implications for animal welfare and dairy science.JDS communications · 2025Review
- Associations Between REM Sleep-like Posture Expression and Cognitive Flexibility in 2-Month-Old Japanese Black Calves.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Farm Animal Welfare: Consumers' Perception Toward Different Breeds of Animals in Italy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Touchscreen Tasks for Cognitive Testing in Domestic Goats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Strategic third-party interventions in feral ungulate affiliation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Cognitive and non-cognitive factors predict pigs' positions in an aggression social network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Human ostension enhances attentiveness but not performance in domestic pigs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Training Protocol for Nellore Cattle in Respirometry Flow Trials Using Non-Ventilated Facial Mask.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Evidence of object permanence, short-term spatial memory, causality, understanding of object properties and gravity across five different ungulate species.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Proximity tracking using ultra-wideband technology for equine social behaviour research.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Video Ethogram of Equine Social Behaviour.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Human-animal interactions and machine-animal interactions in animals under human care: A summary of stakeholder and researcher perceptions and future directions.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024Review
- Adult neurogenesis and the microbiota-gut-brain axis in farm animals: underestimated and understudied parameters for improving welfare in livestock farming.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Changes in salivary oxytocin in response to biologically-relevant events in farm animals: method optimization and usefulness as a biomarker.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Farm animal welfare is a major concern for society and food production. To more accurately evaluate animal farming in general and to avoid exposing farm animals to poor welfare situations, it is necessary to understand not only their behavioral but also their cognitive needs and capacities. Thus, general knowledge of how farm animals perceive and interact with their environment is of major importance for a range of stakeholders, from citizens to politicians to cognitive ethologists to philosophers. This review aims to outline the current state of farm animal cognition research and focuses on ungulate livestock species, such as cattle, horses, pigs and small ruminants, and reflects upon a defined set of cognitive capacities (physical cognition: categorization, numerical ability, object permanence, reasoning, tool use; social cognition: individual discrimination and recognition, communication with humans, social learning, attribution of attention, prosociality, fairness). We identify a lack of information on certain aspects of physico-cognitive capacities in most farm animal species, such as numerosity discrimination and object permanence. This leads to further questions on how livestock comprehend their physical environment and understand causal relationships. Increasing our knowledge in this area will facilitate efforts to adjust husbandry systems and enrichment items to meet the needs and preferences of farm animals. Research in the socio-cognitive domain indicates that ungulate livestock possess sophisticated mental capacities, such as the discrimination between, and recognition of, conspecifics as well as human handlers using multiple modalities. Livestock also react to very subtle behavioral cues of conspecifics and humans. These socio-cognitive capacities can impact human-animal interactions during management practices and introduce ethical considerations on how to treat livestock in general. We emphasize the importance of gaining a better understanding of how livestock species interact with their physical and social environments, as this information can improve housing and management conditions and can be used to evaluate the use and treatment of animals during production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.