Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30838174›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019

Quantitative Evaluation of Intraventricular Delivery of Therapeutic Neural Stem Cells to Orthotopic Glioma.

Margarita Gutova, Linda Flores, Vikram Adhikarla, Lusine Tsaturyan, Revathiswari Tirughana, Soraya Aramburo, Marianne Metz, Joanna Gonzaga, Alexander Annala, Timothy W Synold and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neural stem cells secreting bispecific T cell engager to induce selective antiglioma activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margarita GutovaDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Linda FloresDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Vikram AdhikarlaDivision of Mathematical Oncology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Lusine TsaturyanDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Revathiswari TirughanaDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Soraya AramburoDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Marianne MetzDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Joanna GonzagaDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Alexander AnnalaDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Timothy W SynoldDepartment of Cancer Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Jana PortnowDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Russell C RockneDivision of Mathematical Oncology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Karen S AboodyDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Beckman Research InstituteCity of Hope · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI XIWEI WU · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
A Phase I Study of Intracranially Administered Carboxylesterase-Expressing Neural Stem Cells in Combination with Intravenous Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent High Grade GliomasR01CA198076 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI ABOODY, KAREN S, PORTNOW, JANA · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Development and validation of a computational prediction model for exogenous neural stem cell migration to sites of brain tumorsR03CA216142 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI GUTOVA, MARGARITA, ROCKNE, RUSSELL CHRISTIAN · 2018 to 2019
$173k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198076NCI NIH HHS R03 CA216142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) are inherently tumor-tropic, which allows them to migrate through normal tissue and selectively localize to invasive tumor sites in the brain. We have engineered a clonal, immortalized allogeneic NSC line (HB1.F3.CD21; CD-NSCs) that maintains its stem-like properties, a normal karyotype and is HLA Class II negative. It is genetically and functionally stable over time and multiple passages, and has demonstrated safety in phase I glioma trials. These properties enable the production of an "off-the-shelf" therapy that can be readily available for patient treatment. There are multiple factors contributing to stem cell tumor-tropism, and much remains to be elucidated. The route of NSC delivery and the distribution of NSCs at tumor sites are key factors in the development of effective cell-based therapies. Stem cells can be engineered to deliver and/or produce many different therapeutic agents, including prodrug activating enzymes (which locally convert systemically administered prodrugs to active chemotherapeutic agents); oncolytic viruses; tumor-targeted antibodies; therapeutic nanoparticles; and extracellular vesicles that contain therapeutic oligonucleotides. By targeting these therapeutics selectively to tumor foci, we aim to minimize toxicity to normal tissues and maximize therapeutic benefits. In this manuscript, we demonstrate that NSCs administered via intracerebral/ventricular (IVEN) routes can migrate efficiently toward single or multiple tumor foci. IVEN delivery will enable repeat administrations for patients through an Ommaya reservoir, potentially resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. In our preclinical studies using various glioma lines, we have quantified NSC migration and distribution in mouse brains and have found robust migration of our clinically relevant HB1.F3.CD21 NSC line toward invasive tumor foci, irrespective of their origin. These results establish proof-of-concept and demonstrate the potential of developing a multitude of therapeutic options using modified NSCs.

Indexed as

drug deliverygliomaintraventricular administrationneural stem cellsNSCstherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID30838174
PMCPMC6389659
OpenAlexW2916705431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.