Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30838062›Full record

ArticleBreathe (Sheffield, England)2019

How to validate a diagnosis recorded in electronic health records.

Francis Nissen, Jennifer K Quint, Daniel R Morales, Ian J Douglas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A scoping review of the methodological approaches used in retrospective chart reviews to validate adverse event rates in administrative data.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Defining cases of asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis using electronic health records in the Born in Bradford birth cohort.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  11. Primary care asthma surveillance: a review of knowledge translation tools and strategies for quality improvement.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection across a national primary care network in 2019.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Untangling the complexity of multimorbidity with machine learning.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francis NissenDept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jennifer K QuintNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Daniel R MoralesDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Ian J DouglasDept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802403Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30838062
PMCPMC6395976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.