Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30837936›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2019

Clinical Measures of Bulbar Dysfunction in ALS.

Yana Yunusova, Emily K Plowman, Jordan R Green, Carolina Barnett, Peter Bede

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
32.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New developments in imaging in ALS.Journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yana YunusovaDepartment of Speech Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Emily K PlowmanSwallowing Systems Core, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Jordan R GreenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.
Carolina BarnettDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter BedeComputational Neuroimaging Group, Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University of Toronto · CAHarvard University · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

The development and validation of a novel tool for the assessment of bulbar dysfunction in ALSR01DC017291 · NIDCD · SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JORDAN R GREEN, Yana Yunusova · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
Landis Outstanding Mentor Award SupplementR01NS100859 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PLOWMAN, EMILY KATE · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017291NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulbar impairment represents a hallmark feature of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) that significantly impacts survival and quality of life. Speech and swallowing dysfunction are key contributors to the clinical heterogeneity of ALS and require well-timed and carefully coordinated interventions. The accurate clinical, radiological and electrophysiological assessment of bulbar dysfunction in ALS is one of the most multidisciplinary aspects of ALS care, requiring expert input from speech-language pathologists (SLPs), neurologists, otolaryngologists, augmentative alternative communication (AAC) specialists, dieticians, and electrophysiologists-each with their own evaluation strategies and assessment tools. The need to systematically evaluate the comparative advantages and drawbacks of various bulbar assessment instruments and to develop integrated assessment protocols is increasingly recognized. In this review, we provide a comprehensive appraisal of the most commonly utilized clinical tools for assessing and monitoring bulbar dysfunction in ALS based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) evaluation framework. Despite a plethora of assessment tools, considerable geographical differences exist in bulbar assessment practices and individual instruments exhibit considerable limitations. The gaps identified in the literature offer unique opportunities for the optimization of existing and development of new tools both for clinical and research applications. The multicenter validation and standardization of these instruments will be essential for guideline development and best practice recommendations.

Indexed as

amyotrophic lateral sclerosisBulbar ALSCOSMINdysarthriadysphagiaoutcome assessment (Health Care)

Identifiers

PMID30837936
PMCPMC6389633
OpenAlexW2917258926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.