ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Eliciting Big Data From Small, Young, or Non-standard Languages: 10 Experimental Challenges.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toolkit for acoustic-phonetic analysis of naturalistic speech data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Syntactic change in diachrony versus contact-induced change: two sides of the same coin?The Linguistic review · 2025Article
- Transgressive eroticism and the making and unmaking of the self beyond the object body.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2025Review
- Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging.Radiology · 2024Review
- Addressing Challenges in Formal Research on Moribund Heritage Languages: A Path Forward.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Acceptable Ungrammatical Sentences, Unacceptable Grammatical Sentences, and the Role of the Cognitive Parser.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Principles, Approaches and Challenges of Applying Big Data in Safety Psychology Research.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this work is to identify and analyze a set of challenges that are likely to be encountered when one embarks on fieldwork in linguistic communities that feature small, young, and/or non-standard languages with a goal to elicit big sets of rich data. For each challenge, we (i) explain its nature and implications, (ii) offer one or more examples of how it is manifested in actual linguistic communities, and (iii) where possible, offer recommendations for addressing it effectively. Our list of challenges involves
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.