Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30837684›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2019

Interplay between β-lactamases and new β-lactamase inhibitors.

Karen Bush, Patricia A Bradford

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 270 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 482 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Drug-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. ACS omega · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synergistic eradication of NDM-1Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen BushIndiana University Bloomington, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. karbush@indiana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-2474
Patricia A BradfordAntimicrobial Development Specialists, LLC, Nyack, NY, USA. pabradford@optonline.net.
Dermatology Specialists · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria is commonly associated with production of β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases belonging to different molecular classes: those with a catalytically active serine and those with at least one active-site Zn

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesBoronic AcidsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsavibactamAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesBoronic Acidsvaborbactam

Identifiers

PMID30837684
OpenAlexW2918608884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.