ArticleJournal of biosciences2019
Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea
Article in Journal of biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Chickpea Breeding: Omics Insights for Targeted Abiotic Stress Mitigation and Genetic Enhancement.Biochemical genetics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of drought-tolerant chickpea genotypes (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Greater ecophysiological stress tolerance in the core environment than in extreme environments of wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Screening and Selection of Drought-Tolerant High-Yielding Chickpea Genotypes Based on Physio-Biochemical Selection Indices and Yield Trials.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of genetic and biochemical mechanisms associated with heat shock and heat stress adaptation in grain amaranths.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Unravelling the molecular mechanism underlying drought stress response in chickpeaFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Proteomics approach to investigating osmotic stress effects on pistachio.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Recent advancement in OMICS approaches to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Review
- Isotopically Dimethyl Labeling-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Phosphoproteomes of Soybean Cultivars.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Article
- Is Chickpea a Potential Substitute for Soybean? Phenolic Bioactives and Potential Health Benefits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative physiological and proteomic analysis were performed to understand the stress responses of two chickpea species (C. reticulatum and C. arietinum) against drought. Our study revealed that drought stress reduced root length, leaf water content, and enhanced free proline content in both species. Effect of drought stress appeared to be greater in
Indexed as
Identifiers
30837371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.