Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30837319›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2019

Membrane trafficking in osteoclasts and implications for osteoporosis.

Pei Ying Ng, Amy Brigitte Patricia Ribet, Nathan John Pavlos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Isolation and Generation of Osteoclasts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lysosomal biogenesis and function in osteoclasts: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Osteoclast Methods in Protein Phosphatase Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pei Ying NgBone Biology and Disease Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth 6009, Western Australia.
Amy Brigitte Patricia RibetBone Biology and Disease Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth 6009, Western Australia.
Nathan John PavlosBone Biology and Disease Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth 6009, Western Australia nathan.pavlos@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-188X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoclasts are large multinucleated cells exquisitely adapted to resorb bone matrix. Like other eukaryotes, osteoclasts possess an elaborate ensemble of intracellular organelles through which solutes, proteins and other macromolecules are trafficked to their target destinations via membrane-bound intermediaries. During bone resorption, membrane trafficking must be tightly regulated to sustain the structural and functional polarity of the osteoclasts' membrane domains. Of these, the ruffled border (RB) is most characteristic, functioning as the osteoclasts' secretory apparatus. This highly convoluted organelle is classically considered to be formed by the targeted fusion of acidic vesicles with the bone-facing plasma membrane. Emerging findings disclose new evidence that the RB is far more complex than previously envisaged, possessing discrete subdomains that are serviced by several intersecting endocytic, secretory, transcytotic and autophagic pathways. Bone-resorbing osteoclasts therefore serve as a unique model system for studying polarized membrane trafficking. Recent advances in high-resolution microscopy together with the convergence of genetic and cell biological studies in humans and in mice have helped illuminate the major membrane trafficking pathways in osteoclasts and unmask the core molecular machinery that governs these distinct vesicle transport routes. Among these, small Rab GTPases, their binding partners and members of the endocytic sorting nexin family have emerged as critical regulators. This mini review summarizes our current understanding of membrane trafficking in osteoclasts, the key molecular participants, and discusses how these transport machinery may be exploited for the development of new therapies for metabolic disorders of bone-like osteoporosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCell MembraneHumansLysosomesOsteoclastsOsteoporosisrab GTP-Binding Proteinsrab GTP-Binding Proteinsmembrane traffickingosteoclastosteoporosisRab GTPasessecretory lysosomessorting nexins

Identifiers

PMID30837319
PMCPMC6490703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.